Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient
Published on: November 30, 2022
The Anatomy of Interprofessional Collaboration Around Recommendations in the Intensive Care Unit: An Exploration
Jessica L Logeman1, Christine McCarthy1, Arden O'Donnell1
1Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Background:
Serious illness conversations are an iterative, interprofessional, team-based process that includes recommendations about medical care. Yet, it is not clear how clinicians in different role groups work together in this process.
Objectives:
We sought to examine how interprofessional clinicians in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) who were trained in the serious illness care program (SICP) document recommendations after serious illness conversations.
Design:
This is a retrospective chart review and inductive content analysis.
Settings/Subjects:
We reviewed the charts of patients admitted to the MICU of an academic hospital with a long history of palliative care (PC) in the northeastern United States between January 1 and December 31, 2019, who had at least one documented serious illness conversation.
Results:
Of the 207 conversations identified, 177 (85.5%) included a recommendation: 44.6% (79/177) were documented by registered nurses, 36.7% (65/177) by physician trainees (internal medicine residents and pulmonology/critical care fellows), and 18.6% (33/177) by PC consultants (physicians, nurse practitioners, and PC fellows). Recommendations were categorized into several domains: (1) code status (2) treatment interventions, (3) psychosocial support, and (4) communication. The recommendations textbox was also used to document general updates and patient education. The most common domains documented were code status and treatment interventions, respectively: Registered nurses (40.5%; 20.3%), physician trainees (52.3%; 36.4%), and PC clinicians (42.4%; 32.3%). Clinicians used the direct/active voice to document recommendations concordant with their scope of practice and the reporter/passive voice to document recommendations given by others.
Conclusions:
SICP-trained interprofessional MICU clinicians commonly give and document recommendations on a range of domains and flexibly use direct/active and reporter/passive voice to signal their scope of practice.
More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
05:04Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care