Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026
Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Endovascular vs Medical Treatment of Basilar Artery Occlusion: 3-Year Outcomes of the ATTENTION Randomized Clinical
Wei Hu1, Chunrong Tao1, Rui Li1
1Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Importance:
Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has been established as an effective treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) in the short term. However, the durability of these benefits over the long term has not been well characterized.
Objective:
To determine whether the clinical benefits of EVT for acute BAO are sustained at 3 years, with a primary focus on functional outcomes and mortality compared with best medical management alone.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This study is a 3-year follow-up extension of a multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted between February 2021 and January 2022, with follow-up data collected through January 2025. The study was designed as an open-label, assessor-blinded trial to evaluate the long-term efficacy of EVT. The trial was conducted at 36 comprehensive stroke centers across China, representing a diverse, population-based setting that enhances the generalizability of the results. A total of 340 patients with acute BAO within 12 hours of estimated symptom onset were randomly assigned to the thrombectomy or control group. Eligible participants were adults with imaging-confirmed BAO and without contraindications to endovascular therapy. Of the randomized patients, 307 (90.3%) completed 3-year follow-up-203 in the thrombectomy group and 104 in the control group.
Interventions:
Participants in the thrombectomy group received EVT in combination with best medical management, while the control group received best medical management alone. EVT procedures were performed according to institutional protocols using stent retrievers, aspiration devices, balloon angioplasty, stent deployment, intra-arterial thrombolysis, or combinations of these approaches that were left to the discretion of the treating team.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 3 at 3 years, representing the ability to walk and perform self-care. Secondary outcomes included a mRS score of 0 to 2, distribution across the mRS score categories, and quality of life. These outcomes were prespecified prior to data analysis.
Results:
Among 307 patients (median [IQR] age, 68 [59-75]; 211 [69%] male) with available data, an mRS score of 0 to 3 at 3 years was observed in 78 patients (38.4%) in the thrombectomy group and in 19 patients (18.3%) in the control group (adjusted risk ratio, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.35-3.11; P = .001). The distribution of mRS scores favored the thrombectomy group over the control group (adjusted common odds ratio, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.53-4.43). The cumulative 3-year mortality increased from 36.7% (n = 83) at 90 days to 55.7% (n = 113) in the thrombectomy group and 55.3% (n = 63) to 73.1% (n = 76) in the control group (adjusted risk ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.89). On prespecified subgroup analysis, benefit was observed in patients younger than 70 years; a treatment effect was not demonstrated in patients aged 70 years and older.
Conclusions And Relevance:
At 3 years, the clinical benefit of EVT in patients with acute BAO was durable, with substantially better functional outcomes and reduced mortality compared with medical management. These results reinforce EVT as the standard of care for BAO and support broader implementation and timely access to thrombectomy services.
Trial Registration:
ChiCTR.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR2400082236.
