Device-Oriented CFD Comparison of Rectangular and Circular Microchannels with Single and Double Asymmetric Stenoses...

Microchannels can create disturbed flow patterns by altering pressure gradients, shear forces, and flow symmetry, which are essential in the design of microfluidic devices and, hence, blood-contacting devices. The effect of asymmetric stenosis on pressure, wall shear stress, and velocity in rectangular and circular microchannels with same operating conditions was analyzed in this study using three-dimensional (3D) steady laminar computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Asymmetric flow patterns induced by asymmetric stenosis are of particular importance and remain underexplored, especially in the context of multiple constrictions. This is, to our knowledge, is the first systematic CFD comparison of multiple asymmetric stenoses in circular microchannels directly contrasted with rectangular and single-stenosis cases under identical settings. Several parameters, such as wall shear stress (WSS), pressure, and velocity distributions, were analyzed in various stenotic and non-stenotic geometries. These microchannel models, while not reflecting real blood vessels themselves nor exhibiting wall compliance, pulsatility, or non-Newtonian rheology, replicate important mechanical characteristics of stenosis-mediated flow disturbance. Single and multiple asymmetric stenoses create flow patterns that are similar to those of vascular pathologies. For this reason, these channels should be considered as simplified device-scale models of vascular phenomena as opposed to realistic, in vitro vascular models. The results showed that asymmetric stenosis creates asymmetric velocity peaks and elevated WSS, which are more evident in the case of circular configurations with double asymmetric stenosis. The findings will help design microfluidic devices that mimic unstable flow characteristics that occur in stenotic conditions, and assist in testing clinical devices. In this study, two fabrication-ready microchannel designs under fixed operating conditions (identical inlet velocity and fluid properties) that reflect common microfluidic use were compared. Consequently, all pressure, velocity, and WSS outcomes are interpreted as device-scale responses under fixed velocity, rather than a fundamental isolation of cross-section shape, which would require matched hydraulic diameters or flow rates. This study is explicitly device-oriented, representing a fixed operating point rather than a strict geometric isolation. Accordingly, the results are also expressed with dimensionless loss coefficients (Ktot and Klocal) to enable scale-independent, device-level comparison.