Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Advances and Challenges in Drug Screening for Cancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Review
Shohei Motohashi1, Eriko Katsuta1, Daisuke Ban1
1Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Abstract:
Cancer drug screening is shifting from low-predictive, reductionist assays to human-relevant, data-integrated platforms. This review synthesizes preclinical strategies using a unified lens-Principle, Advantages, Limitations, and Clinical Application-to enable like-for-like comparison. We first appraise traditional two-dimensional (2D) monolayers and animal models, noting scalability and historical utility alongside constrained translational fidelity. We then evaluate advanced systems-patient-derived organoids (PDOs), patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), and organ-on-a-chip-that better recapitulate architecture, microenvironmental cues, and pharmacodynamics (PD), yet face trade-offs in throughput, timelines, costs, and standardization. Functional genomic screens (CRISPR/RNAi) and large-scale pharmacogenomics are summarized as engines for mechanism-based target discovery and resistance mapping, while AI-enabled modeling supports response prediction, biomarker development, and rational combinations. Finally, we discuss trial designs (basket/umbrella), drug repurposing lessons, and regulatory momentum for new approach methodologies. Across platforms, we emphasize cross-model validation, dataset harmonization, and clinically anchored endpoints as prerequisites for real-world impact. We conclude with pragmatic guidance for matching screening modality to study goals, sample constraints, and decision timelines to accelerate precision oncology.
Insights
Cancer drug screening is advancing towards human-relevant platforms. This review compares preclinical models like organoids and xenografts, highlighting their strengths and limitations for precision oncology.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Translational Medicine
- Drug Discovery
Background:
- Traditional cancer drug screening assays (2D monolayers, animal models) have limited translational fidelity.
- There is a growing need for human-relevant, data-integrated preclinical platforms in oncology.
- Advancements are shifting towards more predictive models for cancer therapeutics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize and compare preclinical cancer drug screening strategies.
- To evaluate traditional and advanced models using a unified framework (Principle, Advantages, Limitations, Clinical Application).
- To provide guidance for selecting appropriate screening modalities in precision oncology.
Main Methods:
- Review and appraisal of traditional assays (2D monolayers, animal models).
- Evaluation of advanced preclinical systems: patient-derived organoids (PDOs), patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), organ-on-a-chip.
- Summary of functional genomic screens (CRISPR/RNAi), pharmacogenomics, and AI-enabled modeling.
Main Results:
- Traditional models offer scalability but lack translational fidelity.
- Advanced models (PDOs, PDXs, organ-on-a-chip) better recapitulate human physiology but face challenges in throughput, cost, and standardization.
- Genomic screens and AI modeling are crucial for target discovery, resistance mapping, and response prediction.
Conclusions:
- Cross-model validation, data harmonization, and clinically anchored endpoints are essential for real-world impact.
- Selecting the right screening modality depends on study goals, sample availability, and timelines.
- Pragmatic guidance is provided to accelerate precision oncology through optimized preclinical screening.
More Related Videos
07:40Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
Published on: March 20, 2021
08:46Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
Published on: December 9, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Drug Discovery: Overview
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...