Real-Life Characteristics of Patients with COPD and Discordant CAT-mMRC Questionnaires

Background/Objective: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommends using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale for symptom assessment. However, discordant results between these tools are common and may affect clinical phenotyping and treatment decisions. This study aims to identify clinical, functional, and radiological characteristics associated with discordant CAT and mMRC scores in COPD and assess the stability of this classification over time. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 222 COPD patients classified into GOLD A, B, E, or a newly defined discordant group (GOLD_D), characterized by CAT ≥ 10 with mMRC < 2 or CAT < 10 with mMRC ≥ 2. Clinical, functional, laboratory, and imaging data were collected. Logistic regression identified predictors of GOLD classification. GOLD group changes were assessed at follow-up. Results: At baseline, 12.8% of patients belonged to the GOLD_D group. Compared to GOLD A and B, these patients had lower occupational exposure and higher rates of chest HRCT findings such as consolidations and centrilobular nodules. Regression models confirmed these features and identified FEV1 and FVC as independent predictors. GOLD classification showed notable variability during follow-up. Conclusions: Patients with discordant CAT-mMRC scores display distinct clinical and radiologic traits not captured by standard GOLD categories. These results underscore the limitations of relying solely on symptom scores and support a more comprehensive, trait-based approach to COPD assessment and management.