Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for the Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Total Gastrectomy with Esophagojejunostomy
Published on: August 22, 2025
Global Safety Outcomes of Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement Compared With Radiologic and Surgical Gastrostomy
Rakahn Haddadin1, Sushovan Guha2
1Department of Internal Medicine, HCA Mountain View Hospital, Las Vegas, NV.
Background:
Gastrostomy tube (GT) placement is essential for patients requiring long-term enteral access, but the relative safety of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), radiologic placement (IR), and surgical gastrostomy across global populations remains uncertain. Previous large-scale studies, such as Kohli and colleagues, demonstrated favorable outcomes for PEG in US cohorts; however, their external validity to international health care systems is unclear.
Materials And Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Research Network, including 146 health care organizations worldwide (2005-2024). Hospitalized patients undergoing GT placement through PEG, IR, or surgical techniques were identified using ICD-10-PCS codes. After 1:1 propensity score matching by demographics and comorbidities, outcomes were compared across groups using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. Primary outcomes included mortality, transfusion, colon perforation, and infection; secondary outcomes included discharge disposition, device-related complications, and SNF/rehab placement.
Results:
After matching, PEG was associated with significantly lower odds of transfusion (OR: 0.844, P = 0.001), non-home discharge (OR: 0.514, P < 0.001), and SNF placement (OR: 0.491, P < 0.001) compared with IR, with no significant differences in infection or mortality. Compared with surgical gastrostomy, PEG showed lower risks of colon perforation (OR: 0.144, P < 0.001), transfusion (OR: 0.635, P < 0.001), and mortality (OR: 0.724, P < 0.001), though higher risks of gastrostomy infection (OR: 1.266, P = 0.001) and mechanical complications (OR: 1.129, P = 0.001). IR placement demonstrated lower perforation, transfusion, and mortality risks compared with surgery but higher likelihood of non-home discharge and SNF placement.
Conclusion:
In this global cohort, PEG consistently demonstrated superior safety and patient-centered outcomes compared with IR and surgical gastrostomy, supporting its role as the preferred method of GT placement when feasible. These findings reinforce the need for expanded endoscopic infrastructure and training in health care systems worldwide.
More Related Videos
03:32Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Channel Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer Treatment
Published on: December 27, 2024
09:40An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...