Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

13:51
Synthesis of Core-shell Lanthanide-doped Upconversion Nanocrystals for Cellular Applications
Published on: November 10, 2017
15.8K
LINNDA: Lymphoma identification through neural network detection aid.
Paul Vincent Naser1,2,3,4, Maximilian Fischer2,5,6, Miriam Cindy Maurer5,7
1Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Iscience
|January 1, 2026
Summary
An AI tool called LINNDA improved preoperative diagnosis accuracy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM) by acting as a tie-breaker between human experts, achieving 89.9% accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Medical Imaging Analysis
Background:
- Accurate preoperative differentiation between primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM) is critical for effective patient management and surgical strategy.
- Distinguishing between PCNSL and GBM preoperatively presents a significant diagnostic challenge in neuro-oncology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic performance of an AI-assisted workflow, LINNDA (lymphoma identification through neural network detection aid), in differentiating PCNSL from GBM.
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the AI-assisted workflow against human expert consensus and individual raters.
Main Methods:
- Ten clinicians independently reviewed 46 cases of GBM and PCNSL.
- An AI workflow (LINNDA) integrated a DenseNet169 neural network as a "tie-breaker" when clinicians disagreed.
- The AI's diagnostic performance was evaluated against human expert consensus and in comparison to a third human rater across numerous scenarios.
Main Results:
- Integrating AI predictions into the diagnostic process improved overall accuracy to 89.9%, surpassing expert consensus.
- The AI-assisted approach demonstrated superiority over a third human rater in 5,108 evaluated scenarios.
- LINNDA achieved a negative predictive value of 97% for ruling out PCNSL, supporting its clinical utility.
Conclusions:
- The AI-assisted LINNDA workflow significantly enhances the accuracy of preoperative differentiation between PCNSL and GBM.
- LINNDA provides a reliable tool for clinical decision-making, particularly in cases with diagnostic uncertainty.
- This AI approach offers a valuable adjunct to human expertise in neuro-oncology diagnostics.
