Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Methyl-binding DNA capture Sequencing for Patient Tissues
Published on: October 31, 2016
Cell-free DNA methylation profiling in early-onset preeclampsia using methylated DNA sequencing
M M van Vliet1, R G Boers2, R J H Galjaard3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, 3015CN, the Netherlands; Department of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, 3015CN, the Netherlands.
Introduction:
Distinct DNA methylation profiles have been identified in maternal plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in early-onset preeclampsia (EOPE). However, findings across studies often lack concordance and the biological mechanisms driving methylation differences are largely unknown. We aimed to identify EOPE-associated differentially methylated regions (DMRs), investigate changes in tissue-specific cfDNA contributions and validate previously reported EOPE-associated regions.
Methods:
First-trimester cfDNA (n = 35) and cfDNA after diagnosis (n = 21) were collected from EOPE pregnancies and matched-controls. Placental tissues were collected from EOPE (n = 5) and control (n = 7) pregnancies. MeD-seq assays were performed to identify DMRs. Placental-contribution to cfDNA, cfDNA concentration, EOPE-specific placental markers, and methylation levels at previously identified EOPE-associated regions were compared between cases and controls. Additionally, liver-, kidney-, and endothelium-specific hypermethylated regions were identified using publicly available datasets and compared in cfDNA.
Results:
We identified one DMR in the first trimester and 249 DMRs in our after diagnosis cohort. Total cfDNA concentration was 20-fold higher after EOPE diagnosis compared to controls (p < 0.001). We identified 606 DMRs in EOPE placentas, which unexpectedly were almost not present in cfDNA after EOPE diagnosis. Also, the placental-, liver-, and kidney-specific contributions were relatively decreased, while endothelium-specific methylation was increased. Only 2.7-8.4 % of previously identified regions showed significant differential methylation in our cohort.
Discussion:
Differential tissue contributions to cfDNA likely account for DMRs identified after EOPE diagnosis. Further research is required to clarify the (tissue) origins of identified cfDNA DMRs in more detail. Lack of concordance across studies remains a significant limitation, potentially explained by methodological heterogeneity.
More Related Videos
13:21Comprehensive DNA Methylation Analysis Using a Methyl-CpG-binding Domain Capture-based Method in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients
Published on: June 16, 2017
14:56Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies
Published on: May 6, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...
Epigenetic Regulation