Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Field Collection and Laboratory Maintenance of Canopy-Forming Giant Kelp to Facilitate Restoration
Published on: June 7, 2024
Enhancing spatial representativeness and adaptive management of national parks by integrating biodiversity, ecosystem
Yuanxin Liu1, Mei Hu2, Wenjing Zeng1
1Qianyanzhou Ecological Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China; Taihe-Qianyanzhou Ecological Research Center, Ji'an, 343700, China.
Abstract:
Biodiversity and ecosystem service multifunctionality (ESM) are key considerations in national park development. However, how to integrate these two core elements to underpin national park planning, assessment, and management constitutes a critical scientific question. To address this, the study presents a regional case in the Jinggangshan National Park assessment area, China, employing an ESM index determined by equal weights assigned to four key ecosystem services (ESs): soil conservation, water retention, carbon sequestration, and habitat quality. Based on the "Biodiversity Importance-ESM Importance" framework, we integrated biodiversity indicators, ESM index, and human footprint data to identify priority conservation areas. Meanwhile, we applied Spearman's correlation coefficient to identify the units of long-term trade-offs among ESs and thereby guide spatial planning and management. The results indicated that areas of combined ESM and biodiversity importance spanned approximately 10,000 km2, with significant conservation gaps identified in Chaling, Yongxin, and Guidong counties for sites deemed important in both dimensions. A Core Protection Zone encompassing 2565 km2, representing 25.0 % of the priority areas, along with a Sustainable Development Zone, has been delineated. The existing PAs demonstrate significant coverage disparities across different counties, with some regions having less than 1.0 % coverage of Core Protection Zones. Within the priority areas, long-term trade-off types include habitat quality-soil conservation and water retention-soil conservation, highlighting the need for customized spatial conservation and management strategies tailored to specific trade-off contexts. By integrating ESM, biodiversity, and human activities, the proposed framework provides a transferable methodology for the establishment of national parks in other regions, thereby enhancing the scientific foundation for conservation planning and sustainable management.
Related Concept Videos
What is Biodiversity?
What is Conservation Biology?
Threats to Biodiversity
Biodiversity and Human Values
Ecological Niches
Manipulation and Analysis

