Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

9.9K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
9.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.3K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

9.1K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
9.1K
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

380
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
380
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

10.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
10.1K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

545
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
545

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Serum biomarkers combined with ultrasonography for early diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease confirmed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Acta pharmacologica Sinica·2019
Same author

Triterpenoids from the barks of Juglans hopeiensis.

Phytochemistry·2019
Same author

<i>Dyadobacter flavalbus</i> sp. nov., isolated from lake sediment.

International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology·2019
Same author

Validation of the epigenetic reader bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) as a therapeutic target for treatment of airway remodeling.

Drug discovery today·2019
Same author

Structural characterization, antioxidant activity, and immunomodulatory activity of non-starch polysaccharides from Chuanminshen violaceum collected from different regions.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2019
Same author

Zika virus degrades the ω-3 fatty acid transporter Mfsd2a in brain microvascular endothelial cells and impairs lipid homeostasis.

Science advances·2019
Same journal

Shared frailty sieve estimation for dependent left truncated and interval censored data.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Functional win-fractions regression models for composite outcomes.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Variable selection in causal semiparametric transformation models with all-or-nothing treatment compliance.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Correction to: A uniformisation-driven algorithm for inference-related estimation of a phase-type ageing model.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Unobserved heterogeneity in threshold regression based on the hitting times of a reflected Brownian motion for recurrent hypoglycemia.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Variable selection with broken adaptive ridge regression for interval-censored competing risks data.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K

Confidence intervals for high-dimensional accelerated failure time models under measurement errors.

Qin Yu1, Xin Zhou2, Jia Zhou3

  • 1School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, P. R. China.

Lifetime Data Analysis
|January 4, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces the double debiased Lasso (DDL) method for accurate statistical inference in high-dimensional survival analysis with measurement errors. The DDL method corrects bias and measurement error impacts in accelerated failure time models.

Keywords:
Accelerated failure time modelsCensored survival dataConfidence intervalsDebiasingHigh dimensionalityMeasurement errors

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.7K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.7K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • High-dimensional survival analysis is crucial in fields like molecular biology and economics.
  • Existing sparse modeling methods struggle with statistical inference under measurement errors.
  • Valid inference in error-in-variables accelerated failure time (AFT) models is an underexplored area.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel method, the double debiased Lasso (DDL), for robust statistical inference.
  • To address challenges in high-dimensional error-in-variables AFT models.
  • To construct reliable confidence intervals despite data inaccuracies.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the double debiased Lasso (DDL) estimator.
  • Corrected initial weighted least squares Lasso estimate bias by inverting Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions.
  • Mitigated measurement error impact using nearest positive semi-definite projection for estimators and inverse covariance matrices.

Main Results:

  • Established asymptotic normality for the DDL estimator.
  • Proved estimation consistency for the initial estimator.
  • Demonstrated method effectiveness through simulations and real-world data analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The DDL method provides a statistically valid approach for inference in challenging survival data.
  • The technique effectively handles both high dimensionality and measurement errors.
  • This work advances sparse modeling for survival data with practical implications.