Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
How syntax promotes stereotypes: Assessing the role of pragmatic inference
Kevin J Holmes1, Sarah H Wu2, Nan Elpers2,3
1Department of Psychology, Reed College, 3203 Woodstock Blvd, Portland, OR, 97202, USA. kjholmes@reed.edu.
Linguistic framing effects, like those concerning math ability, are not irrational. They stem from pragmatic inferences in language, demonstrating how communication shapes social beliefs.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Linguistics
Background:
- Linguistic framing influences social beliefs, with traditional views attributing this to irrational cognitive biases.
- Subject-complement syntax can create framing effects, where the complement group becomes the reference point.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if framing effects from subject-complement syntax rely on pragmatic inference abilities.
- To determine if individuals can infer pragmatic meaning from linguistic structures.
Main Methods:
- Two preregistered experiments with 1,593 participants.
- Assessed participants' ability to infer implicatures from subject-complement syntax.
- Controlled for social-cognitive abilities and analyzed framing effect reduction when awareness was explicit.
Main Results:
- Higher ability to infer implicatures correlated with stronger framing effects.
- This relationship persisted across different social groups and controlled for other pragmatic skills.
- Framing effects decreased when participants recognized the influence and explicitly discounted stereotypes.
Conclusions:
- Pragmatic inference is key to understanding subject-complement framing effects.
- Individuals do not automatically accept inferred meanings, suggesting a degree of rational processing.
- Framing effects are a natural outcome of human communication, not solely irrational biases.
Related Concept Videos
Implicit Personality Theories
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Stereotype Content Model
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
The Representativeness Heuristic
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

