A structure-guided approach to noncoding variant evaluation for transcription factor binding using AlphaFold 3
Lukas Gerasimavicius1, Simon C Biddie1,2, Joseph A Marsh1
1MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, United Kingdom.
None:
Noncoding single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) that alter transcription factor (TF) binding can affect gene expression and contribute to disease. Sequence-based methods can excel at predicting TF binding, but rely on training data and can exhibit TF-specific biases. Here, we propose a structure-guided approach for noncoding SNVs, using AlphaFold 3 (AF3) to model TF-DNA complexes and FoldX for downstream physics-based assessment. Benchmarked against single nucleotide polymorphism-systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SNP-SELEX) data for six TFs (SPIB, ELK3, ETV4, SF-1, PAX5, and MEIS2), the FoldX-based strategy showed good agreement with experimental allele preferences. Interestingly, differences in AF3's interface-predicted template modelling (ipTM) score aligned even more closely with SNP-SELEX results, generally surpassing energy-based metrics. Application to known disease-associated variants recapitulated most reported effects for TFs including NKX2-5, GATA3, and USF2A-USF1. In these examples, considering both ΔipTM and FoldX energies proved more reliable than either metric alone. While less accurate than state-of-the-art sequence-based methods, this work demonstrates that structural modelling can yield interpretable insights into how noncoding variants influence TF binding. By highlighting both the promise and limitations of AF3 in this context, our study provides a framework for complementary structural evaluation of regulatory variants.
More Related Videos
07:48Genome-wide Profiling of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Interactions in Candida albicans: A Comprehensive CUT&RUN Method and Data Analysis Workflow
Published on: April 1, 2022
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Transcription Factors
General Transcription Factors
