Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
UK audit of the interoperability of ordered-subset expectation-maximisation reconstruction algorithms
Matthew J Memmott1, Gregory James2, Frances Morgan3
1Nuclear Medicine Department, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester.
This study audited ordered-subset expectation-maximisation (OSEM) algorithms for quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Results showed good agreement between platforms, though users should derive specific factors for their acquisition and reconstruction combinations.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Nuclear Medicine
- Computational Phantoms
Background:
- Filtered back projection (FBP) was previously audited for quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
- Current guidelines favor iterative reconstruction methods like ordered-subset expectation-maximisation (OSEM).
- This study audits OSEM algorithms in clinical use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To audit ordered-subset expectation-maximisation (OSEM) algorithms for quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
- To evaluate the performance of OSEM reconstruction platforms using standardized phantom data.
Main Methods:
- A computational phantom was used to assess sphere diameter, position, activity concentration, uniformity, and resolution.
- Recovery in photopenic areas and small lesions near active structures was evaluated.
- SPECT projections from three manufacturers were reconstructed using six commercial platforms.
Main Results:
- Excellent agreement was observed among platforms using similar OSEM reconstruction methods.
- One platform's results varied due to its inability to perform true 'pencil-beam' OSEM.
- Differences in reconstruction varied with manufacturer data, with wide-beam reconstruction showing the most variation.
Conclusions:
- Reconstruction platforms show generally small differences when processing data from different manufacturers.
- Wide-beam reconstruction methods exhibited the largest variations.
- Users of quantitative SPECT should determine specific calibration factors for their unique acquisition and reconstruction setups.
Related Concept Videos
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

