Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management
Published on: September 12, 2017
Integrating Google Earth Engine and machine learning for urban land use and land cover dynamics analysis
Mubarak Ahmad1, Khan Alam2, Maqbool Ahmad3
1School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Wuxi University, Wuxi, China.
Machine learning algorithms like Random Forest (RF) and Classification and Regression Trees (CART) achieved 95% accuracy for land use and land cover (LULC) classification in Peshawar, outperforming other methods in Google Earth Engine.
Area of Science:
- Remote Sensing
- Geospatial Analysis
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Accurate land use and land cover (LULC) classification is crucial for urban planning and environmental management.
- Data-scarce urban regions present significant challenges for LULC classification due to computational and accuracy limitations.
- Traditional LULC classification methods often fall short in complex urban environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the research gap in LULC classification for data-scarce urban areas.
- To introduce and evaluate robust machine learning algorithms within the Google Earth Engine platform.
- To comparatively analyze the performance of four machine learning classifiers for LULC mapping.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Google Earth Engine (GEE) for LULC classification using Sentinel satellite data (2020-2024).
- Implemented and compared four machine learning algorithms: Classification and Regression Tree (CART), Minimum Distance (MiD), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM).
- Evaluated classifier performance using accuracy assessment metrics, including overall accuracy, Kappa coefficient, Producer's Accuracy (PA), User's Accuracy (UA), Mathew Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and F1 score, with 70% training and 30% testing data splits.
Main Results:
- Random Forest (RF) and CART classifiers achieved the highest overall accuracy (95%) and Kappa coefficients.
- CART and RF demonstrated excellent performance with PA and UA exceeding 90% for all classes.
- MiD exhibited the weakest performance among the tested classifiers. McNemar test indicated no significant difference between CART, RF, and SVM, but CI confirmed CART and RF superiority.
Conclusions:
- RF and CART are highly effective and transferable machine learning algorithms for LULC classification in complex urban environments.
- Google Earth Engine provides a robust platform for implementing and comparing advanced ML algorithms for geospatial analysis.
- The study provides reliable LULC classification data for the urbanized region of Peshawar, overcoming previous limitations.
Related Concept Videos
Levels of Use of a GIS
Manipulation and Analysis
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
GIS Software, Hardware, and Sources of GIS Data
Introduction to GIS
Thematic Layering in GIS

