Comparing delayed matching to sample with three variations of the training-IRAP for establishing derived relations

Area of Science:

• Behavioral Psychology
• Cognitive Science
• Learning Sciences

Background:

• Matching-to-sample (MTS) is a common method for studying derived relations.
• Standard MTS training may limit the emergence of novel relations.
• The training-implicit relational assessment procedure (training-IRAP) offers a potential alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

• To compare the effectiveness of delayed MTS(2s) and training-IRAP procedures on participant yield in establishing derived relations.
• To compare the mean number of training blocks required for each procedure.
• To evaluate modified training-IRAP procedures against standard versions and DMTS(2s).

Main Methods:

• A between-subjects design with 68 typically developing students.
• Comparison of delayed MTS(2s), standard training-IRAP, modified training-IRAP, and delayed modified training-IRAP(2s).
• Abstract stimuli were used, and yield was analyzed at multiple performance thresholds (91.67%, 83.33%, 79%) with a baseline maintenance criterion of 87.5%.

Main Results:

• Modified training-IRAP procedures yielded significantly higher participant success rates across all analysis levels.
• Delayed MTS(2s) followed the modified training-IRAP, with the standard training-IRAP showing the lowest yield.
• The delayed MTS(2s) and delayed modified training-IRAP(2s) groups required the fewest training blocks.

Conclusions:

• Modified training-IRAP procedures are more effective than DMTS(2s) for establishing derived relations.
• The findings suggest modifications to training-IRAP enhance its utility.
• Implications for improving precision, scope, and depth in conceptual, experimental, and applied relational learning research are discussed.