Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Relationship Between Lipotoxicity and HFpEF
Published on: March 29, 2024
Microvascular dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Ornela Velollari1,2, Antonio Biancofiore3, Maximilian Olschewski1,2
1Department of Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Insights
Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) significantly impacts heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients, worsening both systolic and diastolic function. CMD is highly prevalent in HFpEF, indicating a critical link between these conditions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) impact on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is not well understood.
- The combined effects of CMD and HFpEF on cardiac function parameters remain unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between CMD and cardiac function in HFpEF patients.
- To assess systolic and diastolic function parameters in the context of CMD and HFpEF.
Main Methods:
- Invasive assessment of CMD in consecutive patients.
- Evaluation of global longitudinal strain (GLS) for systolic function.
- Assessment of E/E', left atrial reservoir strain (LARS), and LV stiffness constant (β) for diastolic function.
Main Results:
- CMD was present in 49.7% of patients; HFpEF in 24%.
- HFpEF prevalence was higher in CMD patients (32% vs. 16%).
- CMD correlated with impaired systolic (GLS) and diastolic function (E/E', LARS, LV stiffness).
Conclusions:
- HFpEF is common in CMD patients, with CMD linked to systolic and diastolic dysfunction.
- CMD exacerbates diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF patients.
- CMD significantly impacts cardiac mechanics in HFpEF.
Background And Aim:
The impact of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) on parameters of systolic and diastolic function, particularly in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), is poorly understood. Although these conditions often overlap, their combined impact on parameters of systolic and diastolic function remains unexplored.
Methods:
Consecutive patients undergoing invasive CMD assessment were enrolled. Systolic function was assessed by global longitudinal strain (GLS), diastolic function by E/E', left atrial reservoir strain (LARS), and non-invasive single-beat pressure-volume relationship stiffness constant (β) estimation.
Results:
Of 145 patients, 72 (49.7%) had CMD, 35 (24%) HFpEF, and 23 (16%) both conditions. HFpEF was twice as prevalent in CMD patients as compared to patients without CMD (32% vs. 16%, p = 0.034). Both CMD was associated with parameters of both diastolic (E/E' β = 0.29, p < 0.001, LV stiffness constant β = 0.23; p = 0.006, and LARS β = -0.21, p = 0.02) and systolic function (GLS β = 0.31, p < 0.001). The presence of CMD was associated with an impairment in LV stiffness both in patients with and without HFpEF (p for interaction = 0.044).
Conclusion:
HFpEF is highly prevalent in patients with CMD, and CMD is associated with both systolic and diastolic dysfunction. In patients with HFpEF, an additional worsening of diastolic function is observed.
More Related Videos
08:35Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
07:09A Surgical Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Tibetan Minipigs
Published on: February 18, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations