Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism
Published on: October 3, 2018
The neurocognitive aspects of empathy and theory of mind in pragmatic language processing
Elizabeth Valles-Capetillo1,2, Fariea Bakul3, Julia Dominguez4
1Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. ecapetil@uab.edu.
Abstract:
Understanding pragmatic language, such as irony or white lies, requires complex social-cognitive processing. While both empathy and Theory of Mind (ToM) are known contributors, their relevance remains poorly understood. This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and behavioral tests to investigate how individual differences in ToM and empathy are associated with neural activation during comprehension of pragmatic language. Forty-five neurotypical adults completed a Contextual Discrepancy Task featuring ironic, literal, white lie, and unrelated statements while undergoing fMRI. Behavioral measures of empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index) and ToM (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, Short Story Task) were collected. Brain activity was constrained to empathy- and ToM-related regions identified through Neurosynth meta-analyses. Results revealed a shared frontotemporal network, particularly the inferior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and supramarginal gyrus, supporting all statement types. Regression models showed that ToM, especially its affective components, predicted activation in mentalizing regions, such as the precuneus, angular gyrus, and amygdala. Empathy was linked to signal changes in the insula and supramarginal gyrus, underscoring their role in emotional simulation. The supramarginal gyrus emerged as a convergence zone integrating affective and cognitive contributions across both domains. These findings highlight the integrative and distributed nature of the neural architecture supporting pragmatic language processing, offering insight into how emotion and inference jointly shape communicative interpretation. Implications extend to understanding communicative impairments in clinical populations and informing interventions targeting social-cognitive processing.
More Related Videos
10:11Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
Published on: December 14, 2012
09:27Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Empathy
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Language and Cognition
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Cognitive Theories: Lazarus Mediational Theory of Emotion
Cognitive Appraisal and Emotional Response
Lazarus proposed that...
Information Processing Approach