Orolabial and Genital Herpes Clinical Trials: A Meta-analysis of Endpoints

Abigail Sloan1, Mahta Mortezavi2, Jacqueline Gerhart1

  • 1Research and Development, Pfizer, New York City, New York, USA.

PubMed

Insights

New antiviral therapies for herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections are needed. Clinical trials for HSV treatments have used varied endpoints, hindering consistent study design and evaluation of new agents.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Existing antiviral agents for orolabial and genital herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections require complementary therapies.
  • Evaluating new HSV treatments is challenging due to inconsistent clinical trial endpoint definitions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of HSV treatments.
  • To assess the heterogeneity of endpoints used in HSV clinical trials over the past 30 years.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 RCTs published between 1995 and 2024.
  • Included immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with established HSV infection.
  • Analyzed endpoints for episodic treatment (healing time, symptom cessation) and suppressive therapy (recurrence rates, shedding rates).

Main Results:

  • Significant heterogeneity in clinical trial endpoints and definitions for HSV infections was observed over the last three decades.
  • Commonly used endpoints included time to healing, symptom cessation, recurrence rates, and viral shedding rates.
  • No single endpoint was consistently applied across studies.

Conclusions:

  • The evaluation of novel antiviral agents for HSV infections is hampered by nonstandardized clinical trial endpoints.
  • Reassessing and standardizing trial endpoints, with regulatory guidance, is crucial for consistent study design.
  • Standardized endpoints will facilitate the effective evaluation of new therapeutic agents for herpes simplex virus.

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
397
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.5K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.1K