Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Porcine Corneal Tissue Explant to Study the Efficacy of Herpes Simplex Virus-1 Antivirals
Published on: September 20, 2021
Orolabial and Genital Herpes Clinical Trials: A Meta-analysis of Endpoints
Abigail Sloan1, Mahta Mortezavi2, Jacqueline Gerhart1
1Research and Development, Pfizer, New York City, New York, USA.
Abstract:
Although several antiviral agents are licensed for the treatment of orolabial and genital herpes simplex virus infections, new therapies are needed. Trial design is challenging for these indications due to the heterogeneity of endpoints in prior trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials published between 1995 and 2024 consisting of adults with established herpes simplex virus infection who were immunocompetent and nonpregnant. A total of 22 articles met the inclusion criteria. For episodic treatment, endpoints included time to healing, proportion with an aborted lesion, and time to cessation of symptoms. For daily suppressive therapy, endpoints included time to first recurrence, proportion recurrence-free at 1 year, and total shedding rate. We observed that over the last 30 years, clinical trials have used various endpoints with nonstandardized definitions. A reassessment of appropriate endpoints along with regulatory guidance would assist with consistent study design for evaluation of new agents.
Insights
New antiviral therapies for herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections are needed. Clinical trials for HSV treatments have used varied endpoints, hindering consistent study design and evaluation of new agents.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Existing antiviral agents for orolabial and genital herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections require complementary therapies.
- Evaluating new HSV treatments is challenging due to inconsistent clinical trial endpoint definitions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of HSV treatments.
- To assess the heterogeneity of endpoints used in HSV clinical trials over the past 30 years.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 RCTs published between 1995 and 2024.
- Included immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with established HSV infection.
- Analyzed endpoints for episodic treatment (healing time, symptom cessation) and suppressive therapy (recurrence rates, shedding rates).
Main Results:
- Significant heterogeneity in clinical trial endpoints and definitions for HSV infections was observed over the last three decades.
- Commonly used endpoints included time to healing, symptom cessation, recurrence rates, and viral shedding rates.
- No single endpoint was consistently applied across studies.
Conclusions:
- The evaluation of novel antiviral agents for HSV infections is hampered by nonstandardized clinical trial endpoints.
- Reassessing and standardizing trial endpoints, with regulatory guidance, is crucial for consistent study design.
- Standardized endpoints will facilitate the effective evaluation of new therapeutic agents for herpes simplex virus.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

