Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Using a Murine Model of Psychosocial Stress in Pregnancy as a Translationally Relevant Paradigm for Psychiatric Disorders in Mothers and Infants
Published on: June 13, 2021
Diagnostic Gap in Rural Maternal Health: Initial Validation of a Parsimonious Clinical Model for Hypertensive
Isaac Zablah1, Carlos Agudelo-Santos2, Yolly Molina2
1Neurosciences Research Group, Faculty of Medical Sciences, National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa 11101, Honduras.
Background/Objectives: In low-resource settings, diagnostic delays and limited specialist access worsen health inequalities, making hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs) defined by new-onset blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg after 20 weeks of gestation, with or without proteinuria, a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated the diagnostic effectiveness of a rural-applicable clinical model for detecting HDPs in a real-world population from Hospital General San Felipe (Tegucigalpa, Honduras). Methods: A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted on 147 consecutive pregnant women in February 2025. Clinical documentation from the initial appointment defined HDP. We modeled HDP risk using penalized logistic regression and common factors such maternal age, gestational age, blood pressure, BMI, primary symptoms, semi-quantitative proteinuria, and medical history. Median imputation was utilized for missing numbers and stratified five-fold cross-validation assessed performance. We assessed AUROC, AUPRC, Brier score, calibration, and operational utility at a data-driven threshold. Results: Of patients, 27.9% (41/147) had HDP. The model had an AUROC of 0.614, AUPRC of 0.461 (cross-validation averages), and Brier score of 0.253. The threshold with the highest F1-score (0.474) had a sensitivity of 0.561, specificity of 0.679, positive predictive value of 0.404, and negative predictive value of 0.800. HDP had higher meaning systolic/diastolic/mean arterial pressure (130.7/82.9/98.9 vs. 120.5/76.1/90.9 mmHg) and ordinal proteinuria (0.59 vs. 0.36 units). Conclusions: The model had moderate but clinically meaningful discriminative performance using low-cost, commonly obtained variables, excellent calibration, and a good negative predictive value for first exclusion. These findings suggest modification of predictors, a larger sample size, and clinical usefulness assessment using decision curves and process outcomes, including quick referral and prophylaxis. This approach aligns with contemporary developments in the 2023-2025 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and 2024 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, which emphasize earlier identification and risk-stratified management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy as a cornerstone of women's cardiovascular health.
Background/Objectives: In low-resource settings, diagnostic delays and limited specialist access worsen health inequalities, making hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs) defined by new-onset blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg after 20 weeks of gestation, with or without proteinuria, a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated the diagnostic effectiveness of a rural-applicable clinical model for detecting HDPs in a real-world population from Hospital General San Felipe (Tegucigalpa, Honduras). Methods: A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted on 147 consecutive pregnant women in February 2025. Clinical documentation from the initial appointment defined HDP. We modeled HDP risk using penalized logistic regression and common factors such maternal age, gestational age, blood pressure, BMI, primary symptoms, semi-quantitative proteinuria, and medical history. Median imputation was utilized for missing numbers and stratified five-fold cross-validation assessed performance. We assessed AUROC, AUPRC, Brier score, calibration, and operational utility at a data-driven threshold. Results: Of patients, 27.9% (41/147) had HDP. The model had an AUROC of 0.614, AUPRC of 0.461 (cross-validation averages), and Brier score of 0.253. The threshold with the highest F1-score (0.474) had a sensitivity of 0.561, specificity of 0.679, positive predictive value of 0.404, and negative predictive value of 0.800. HDP had higher meaning systolic/diastolic/mean arterial pressure (130.7/82.9/98.9 vs. 120.5/76.1/90.9 mmHg) and ordinal proteinuria (0.59 vs. 0.36 units). Conclusions: The model had moderate but clinically meaningful discriminative performance using low-cost, commonly obtained variables, excellent calibration, and a good negative predictive value for first exclusion. These findings suggest modification of predictors, a larger sample size, and clinical usefulness assessment using decision curves and process outcomes, including quick referral and prophylaxis. This approach aligns with contemporary developments in the 2023-2025 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and 2024 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, which emphasize earlier identification and risk-stratified management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy as a cornerstone of women's cardiovascular health.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...

