Comparative Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Evolution Patterns of Acoustic Emission Source Localization Under True
Peng Chen1, Shibo Yu1, Hui Wang1
1China-South Africa Joint Research Center for Development and Utilization on Mineral Resources, BGRIMM Technology Group, Beijing 100160, China.
Rock failure under loading and unloading exhibits four stages. Unloading causes premature fracturing with a stronger acoustic emission (AE) response, while pure loading concentrates failure near rupture. AE analysis reveals distinct crack propagation patterns for each stress path.
Area of Science:
- Geotechnical Engineering
- Rock Mechanics
- Materials Science
Background:
- Microseismic/acoustic emission (AE) monitoring provides real-time, non-destructive insights into rock deformation and failure.
- Understanding rock failure mechanisms under different stress paths is crucial for geological hazard assessment and engineering design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comparatively investigate the spatiotemporal evolution of AE during sandstone failure under pure loading versus load-unloading conditions.
- To analyze AE waveform parameters and source locations to characterize distinct failure patterns.
Main Methods:
- Experimental design involving sandstone subjected to two distinct stress paths: pure loading and load-unloading.
- Acquisition and analysis of AE waveform time-frequency parameters and source location data.
- Comparative analysis of failure evolution patterns based on AE characteristics.
Main Results:
- Both loading paths showed a four-stage failure process. Unloading induced premature fracturing with a more pronounced AE response compared to pure loading.
- Dominant AE frequencies were 0-200 kHz, with a notable low-frequency, high-amplitude zone during the final failure stage (Stage 4).
- Load-unloading revealed tensile crack nucleation (Stage 3) and subsequent propagation/coalescence (Stage 4), forming macroscopic fractures.
- Pure loading indicated compression-shear fracture development (Stage 3) and propagation into a through-going shear plane (Stage 4).
Conclusions:
- Rock failure mechanisms differ significantly between pure loading and load-unloading stress paths.
- AE monitoring effectively captures the spatiotemporal evolution of rock failure, distinguishing between tensile and shear fracture modes.
- The findings enhance the understanding of rock mass behavior under complex stress conditions, relevant for geomechanical applications.
More Related Videos
06:55Kinematic History of a Salient-recess Junction Explored through a Combined Approach of Field Data and Analog Sandbox Modeling
Published on: August 5, 2016
07:09In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Elastic Strain Energy for Shearing Stresses
Normal Strain under Axial Loading
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by a...
