Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Effects of Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Published on: January 19, 2024
Impact of Helicopter Vibrations on In-Ear PPG Monitoring for Vital Signs-Mountain Rescue Technology Study (MoReTech)
Aaron Benkert1,2, Jakob Bludau3, Lukas Boborzi1
1Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Abstract:
Pulsoximeters are widely used in the medical care of preclinical patients to evaluate the cardiorespiratory status and monitor basic vital signs, such as pulse rate (PR) and oxygen saturation (SpO2). In many preclinical situations, air transport of the patient by helicopter is necessary. Conventional pulse oximeters, mostly used on the patient's finger, are prone to motion artifacts during transportation. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether simulated helicopter vibration has an impact on the photoplethysmogram (PPG) derived from an in-ear sensor at the external ear canal and whether the vibration influences the calculation of vital signs PR and SpO2. The in-ear PPG signals of 17 participants were measured at rest and under exposure to vibration generated by a helicopter simulator. Several signal quality indicators (SQI), including perfusion index, skewness, entropy, kurtosis, omega, quality index, and valid pulse detection, were extracted from the in-ear PPG recordings during rest and vibration. An intra-subject comparison was performed to evaluate signal quality changes under exposure to vibration. The analysis revealed no significant difference in any SQI between vibration and rest (all p > 0.05). Furthermore, the vital signs PR and SpO2 calculated using the in-ear PPG signal were compared to reference measurements by a clinical monitoring system (ECG and SpO2 finger sensor). The results for the PR showed substantial agreement (CCCrest = 0.96; CCCvibration = 0.96) and poor agreement for SpO2 (CCCrest = 0.41; CCCvibration = 0.19). The results of our study indicate that simulated helicopter vibration had no significant impact on the calculation of the SQIs, and the calculation of vital signs PR and SpO2 did not differ between rest and vibration conditions.
More Related Videos
10:45A Community-based Stress Management Program: Using Wearable Devices to Assess Whole Body Physiological Responses in Non-laboratory Settings
Published on: January 22, 2018
07:30A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017