Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
When and how to disclose AI use in academic peer review
Ken Masters1, Jennifer Cleland2
1Medical Education and Informatics Department, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
None:
Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to review academic papers is happening and cannot be ignored by journals. There is a need to find a balance between outright banning and uncontrolled usage. Medical Teacher recognises this need, and this commentary views the problem within the general context of authorship, discusses some of the problems surrounding AI-reviewing, and offers a middle ground of practice and disclosure that will assist authors, reviewers, and the journal in ensuring that the review process is not compromised.
Related Concept Videos
Proofreading
Neural Regulation
Ethics in Research
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
