Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

08:22
Tissue-specific miRNA Expression Profiling in Mouse Heart Sections Using In Situ Hybridization
Published on: September 15, 2018
8.6K
Identification of Heart Transplant Rejection Subtypes With Circulating MicroRNAs
Jason F Goldberg1,2,3, Pramita Bagchi4, Angela Mercado5
1Inova Children's Hospital, Falls Church, VA (J.F.G.).
Circulation. Heart Failure
|January 12, 2026
Summary
Circulating microRNAs show high accuracy in identifying acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in heart transplant recipients. Elevated microRNA clinical rejection scores (CRS) predict increased risk of future rejection, allograft dysfunction, or death.
Area of Science:
- Transplantation immunology
- Biomarker discovery
- Molecular diagnostics
Background:
- Circulating microRNAs are potential biomarkers for acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after heart transplantation.
- Assessing microRNA characteristics and diagnostic performance alongside clinical rejection scores (CRS) using blood samples at endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of microRNAs and CRS for detecting ACR and AMR.
- To determine the predictive value of microRNA-based CRS for long-term transplant outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Prospective longitudinal cohort study (GRAfT) involving microRNA sequencing on blood samples from heart transplant recipients.
- Logistic regression modeling to develop ACR and AMR CRS based on previously identified microRNAs.
- Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for diagnostic performance and Cox proportional hazard models for outcome prediction.
Main Results:
- High diagnostic performance for CRS: AUC 0.93 for ACR and 0.92 for AMR.
- Elevated CRS (threshold 65) demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for both ACR and AMR.
- A 10-point increase in CRS was significantly associated with increased hazard for subsequent rejection, allograft dysfunction, or death.
Conclusions:
- Circulating microRNAs reliably identify ACR and AMR, correlating with EMB findings.
- MicroRNA-based CRS serves as a valuable noninvasive tool for screening and diagnosing rejection.
- Further validation could establish microRNA CRS as a substitute for EMB in managing heart transplant recipients.

