Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Published on: September 13, 2015
Central and peripheral excitability in restless limbs syndrome
Amedeo De Grado1,2,3,4, Gaia Fanella5,6, James Howells7
1Neurophysiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico 'Carlo Besta', Milan, Italy.
None:
Restless limbs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder characterized by an uncontrollable urge to move the limbs. Although it affects up to 10% of the general population, its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Neurophysiological excitability testing may help elucidate mechanisms related to sensorimotor integration, axonal ion channel dysfunction and impaired neural inhibition. This study aimed to assess both CNS and PNS function by examining cortical, spinal and peripheral nerve excitability within the same individuals for the first time. To investigate potential widespread excitability changes in RLS, we specifically analysed hand muscles, offering new insights into the extent of neural involvement beyond the lower limbs. The study included 56 RLS patients, divided into treated and untreated groups, along with 32 healthy controls. Notably, none of the patients experienced symptoms in their hands. Cortical excitability was assessed via threshold-tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to evaluate intracortical inhibition and facilitation. Sensory-motor integration was measured via long-latency reflexes (LLRs), while spinal cord excitability was assessed using F-waves, H-reflexes and RIII-reflexes. Axonal excitability was examined using the extended TRONDNF protocol. TMS revealed a significant reduction in short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in patients, particularly at inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) of 2.5 and 3 ms. When averaging across ISIs from 1 to 7 ms, patients on medication exhibited significantly less inhibition compared to healthy controls. Long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) was also reduced at ISIs of 150 and 200 ms, while facilitation parameters remained within normal ranges. Patients exhibited increased amplitude of the second component of the LLR recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis, whereas RIII reflex measurements showed no significant differences. Axonal excitability testing revealed a graded increase in hyperpolarization-activated currents in patients with more severe symptoms. The observed reductions in SICI and LICI suggest impaired intracortical inhibition in the M1 hand area, offering indirect evidence of cortical dysfunction in regions clinically unaffected by the disease. The increased LLR amplitudes further indicate altered sensorimotor integration at the cortical level, whereas the absence of significant changes in RIII reflexes suggests that segmental spinal dysfunction within the pain pathway of the upper limbs is unlikely. Finally, axonal excitability findings point to a potential role of hyperpolarization-activated currents in either contributing to or predisposing individuals to RLS symptoms.
Related Concept Videos
Restless Leg Syndrome and Night Terrors
The exact cause of RLS is not fully understood, but it is believed to involve dopamine, a neurotransmitter that helps regulate muscle movement. Imbalances in dopamine levels...
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic...
Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers
REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
RBD is significantly associated with...
Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Centrally acting drugs are classified into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic drugs such as baclofen, diazepam, and tizanidine inhibit spinal motor neurons and decrease muscle tone. Spasmolytic drugs are administered for severe and chronic spasms due to multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, stroke, and spinal cord and muscle injuries. However,...
Drugs Acting on Autonomic Ganglia: Stimulants
Ganglionic stimulants activate NM nicotinic receptors in autonomic ganglia, falling into two categories: nicotine mimetics [e.g., lobeline, dimethylpiperazine, tetramethylammonium] and muscarinic receptor agonists [e.g., muscarine, methacholine]. The first category's action is rapid and blocked by nicotinic receptor antagonists, while the second category's action is delayed and blocked by atropine-like agents. Nicotine, an alkaloid, affects the heart rate by stimulating...

