Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
Published on: September 20, 2016
Multicancer Detection Assays: Promise and Potential Harms of a Novel Cancer Screening Tool
Caroline M Snead1, Dominick Zheng2, Quyen Ngo-Metzger3
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Multicancer detection (MCD) tests offer early cancer identification via blood tests but carry risks like false positives, overdiagnosis, and health system strain. Careful evaluation and clear protocols are crucial for their safe integration into cancer screening.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Multicancer detection (MCD) tests represent a significant advancement in cancer screening.
- These blood-based tests aim to identify multiple cancer types simultaneously, potentially improving early detection and accessibility compared to traditional methods.
- MCD tests show promise in enhancing screening for cancers with existing modalities and addressing gaps for those without.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the potential benefits and harms of emerging multicancer detection (MCD) tests.
- To explore the implications of MCD tests for cancer screening, healthcare resources, and patient equity.
- To identify essential components for the responsible integration of MCD tests into clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Review of emerging multicancer detection (MCD) technologies and their performance characteristics.
- Analysis of potential benefits, including earlier cancer detection and broader screening applicability.
- Assessment of potential harms, such as false-positive/negative results, overdiagnosis, and healthcare system impacts.
Main Results:
- MCD tests demonstrate capability in detecting cancer signals and suggesting tissue of origin.
- Potential harms include emotional distress from false positives, false reassurance from false negatives, overdiagnosis of indolent cancers, and increased healthcare resource utilization.
- Concerns regarding unclear follow-up protocols, limited harms reporting, and equity issues due to trial underrepresentation persist.
Conclusions:
- Rigorous evaluation, transparent reporting of harms, and robust follow-up and shared decision-making protocols are essential for MCD tests to provide net benefit.
- Careful integration into existing screening practices is necessary to maximize benefits and minimize unintended consequences as MCD tests evolve.
- Addressing equity concerns and ensuring diverse representation in clinical trials are critical for equitable MCD test implementation.
More Related Videos
08:14MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening
Published on: October 26, 2017
07:59Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023