Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy
Published on: October 14, 2017
Integrating AI design tools into traditional design workflows: A study on collaborative tool usage willingness based
Hong Zou1, Mangting He2, Zichuan Liu1
1School of Fine Arts, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, 510665, China.
Designers embrace AI tools collaboratively, not substitutively. Factors like complexity cause burnout, reducing willingness, while trust and adaptability foster AI-human collaboration in design workflows.
Area of Science:
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Design Studies
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Rapid advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) are transforming professional design workflows.
- Designers are increasingly adopting a collaborative approach, integrating AI tools alongside traditional methods rather than replacing them.
- Understanding the factors influencing this collaborative tool usage is crucial for effective human-AI integration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the key determinants of designers' willingness to engage in collaborative tool usage with AI.
- To analyze the influence of push (complexity, limitations), pull (complementarity, humanization), and mooring (trust, social influence, habit, adaptability) factors on this willingness.
- To extend the Push-Pull-Mooring (PPM) framework to explain multi-tool co-use in design.
Main Methods:
- A quantitative study utilizing survey data from 404 professional designers.
- Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed for data analysis.
- The study adopted the Push-Pull-Mooring (PPM) framework to model influencing factors.
Main Results:
- Operational complexity and tool limitations were found to increase tool burnout, negatively impacting collaborative willingness.
- Tool complementarity positively influenced willingness, while perceived humanization had a negative effect, potentially due to undermining creative autonomy.
- Mooring factors including tool trust, social influence, habit, and integration adaptability significantly promoted AI and traditional tool collaboration.
Conclusions:
- Human-AI cooperation in design faces psychological challenges, including emotional fatigue and concerns over creative autonomy.
- The PPM framework effectively explains multi-tool co-use, extending beyond simple tool replacement scenarios.
- Actionable insights are provided for designing AI tools that balance designer agency with optimized human-machine collaboration.
Related Concept Videos
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Design Example: Forces in Sluice Gate
Key variables in...
Three-Dimensional Force System:Problem Solving
To solve a three-dimensional force system, first resolve each force into its respective scalar components. Do this using...
Design Example: Managing Concrete Workability

