Supplementary biomarker testing in molecular tumor boards increases actionable therapy recommendations: a prospective

Alexander Scheiter1,2, Simon Mellin3, Felix Keil3

  • 1Institute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. Alexander.Scheiter@klinik.uni-regensburg.de.

BMC Medicine
|January 13, 2026
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Integrating additional biomarkers beyond next-generation sequencing (NGS) in molecular tumor boards (MTBs) significantly expands eligibility for targeted therapies in advanced cancers. This approach improves clinical benefit rates and enhances precision oncology outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genomics
  • Biomarker Discovery

Background:

  • Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) are crucial for guiding therapy selection in rare and advanced cancers.
  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a standard diagnostic tool, but integrating additional biomarkers may uncover more actionable findings.
  • Emerging biomarkers like Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-low, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and targets for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) show promise across various tumor types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of integrating supplementary biomarker analyses beyond standard NGS on therapy recommendations and clinical outcomes within molecular tumor boards.
  • To assess the utility of biomarkers such as HER2-low status, HRD, and ADC targets in expanding treatment options for patients with advanced cancers.
  • To evaluate the clinical benefit rate in patients receiving therapies guided by comprehensive biomarker assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Tumor samples were analyzed using the TSO500® panel for tumor mutational burden (TMB).
  • HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
  • Additional assessments included ADC IHC, microsatellite instability (MSI) PCR, mismatch repair (MMR) IHC, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) IHC, and HRD analysis. Weekly MTB discussions and outcome tracking were performed.

Main Results:

  • Of 658 patients, 329 received therapy recommendations, with 182 based on supplementary biomarkers. One hundred recommendations were implemented, 37% stemming from these supplementary diagnostics.
  • The clinical benefit rate was 45.3% among 64 response-evaluable patients.
  • HER2-low status broadened targeted therapy options, HRD analysis refined stratification for PARP inhibitors, and ADC IHC supported 20 recommendations and 2 implementations.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating additional biomarker assessments into MTB workflows significantly enhances precision oncology.
  • This comprehensive approach expands the pool of patients eligible for targeted therapies, leading to improved treatment strategies.
  • The study highlights the value of multi-modal biomarker analysis in maximizing therapeutic opportunities for cancer patients.