Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.4K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.4K
Immunogold Electron Microscopy01:20

Immunogold Electron Microscopy

5.3K
Immunoelectron microscopy utilizes immunogold labeling of endogenous proteins with specific antibodies to detect and localize these proteins in cells and tissues. The procedure provides insights into the distribution and quantification of protein under different stimulation conditions offering clues about their functions. Conjugating highly electron-dense gold particles with primary or secondary antibodies allow antigen detection on and within cells, with high resolution and specificity.
5.3K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

256.7K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
256.7K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

64.7K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
64.7K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.7K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.7K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

6.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
6.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impacting lives of people with diabetes: lessons learnt in India may be applicable to other low- and middle-income countries.

Diabetologia·2026
Same authorSame journal

Automated Insulin Delivery Use Among Preschool-Age Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A T1D Exchange Multicenter Analysis.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2026
Same author

Overlap of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Pre-eclampsia: A Scoping Review.

Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders·2026
Same author

Stress Fractures in a U.S. Military Population by Duration of Active Duty-A Retrospective, Sex-Stratified Cross-Sectional Study.

Military medicine·2026
Same author

Age-related patterns of cardiometabolic risk factors for complications in type 2 diabetes.

Diabetologia·2026
Same author

Assessing the efficacy, safety and utility of fully closed-loop insulin delivery compared to standard insulin therapy with a continuous glucose monitor in adults with type 2 diabetes (COYOTE study): a randomised parallel study protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Mind the Gap: A Sequential 4-Step Missing Data Management for CGM-Derived Endpoints in Diabetes Clinical Trials.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2026
Same journal

Changes in HbA1c With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy Alone and Followed by Initiation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Retrospective Analysis of U.S. Medical Claims Data.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2026
Same journal

Performance and Safety of a 15-Day Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Adults With Diabetes: A Multicenter Trial.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2026
Same journal

Glycaemic variability and preserved performance in elite futsal players with type 1 diabetes.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2026
Same journal

Design and Evaluation of a Novel Clinical Decision Support Algorithm for Weekly Insulin Efsitora Alfa.

Journal of diabetes science and technology·2026
See all related articles
  1. Home
  3. Research Code Sharing In Support Of Gold Standard Science.
  1. Home
  3. Research Code Sharing In Support Of Gold Standard Science.

Related Experiment Video

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.6K

Research Code Sharing in Support of Gold Standard Science.

David C Klonoff1,2, Juan Espinoza3, Julia K Mader1,4

  • 1Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Burlingame, CA, USA.

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
|January 14, 2026

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sharing research code openly enhances scientific transparency and reproducibility. Open access repositories improve research verification, collaboration, and researcher visibility, aligning with Gold Standard Science principles.

Keywords:
Gold Standard Sciencecodedatadiabetesrepositoryreproducibility

More Related Videos

Exploring the Effects of Spaceflight on Mouse Physiology using the Open Access NASA GeneLab Platform
11:08

Exploring the Effects of Spaceflight on Mouse Physiology using the Open Access NASA GeneLab Platform

Published on: January 13, 2019

12.8K
Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

862

Related Experiment Videos

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.6K
Exploring the Effects of Spaceflight on Mouse Physiology using the Open Access NASA GeneLab Platform
11:08

Exploring the Effects of Spaceflight on Mouse Physiology using the Open Access NASA GeneLab Platform

Published on: January 13, 2019

12.8K
Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

862

Area of Science:

  • Scientific research practices
  • Open science initiatives
  • Reproducibility in medicine

Background:

  • Open access code sharing aligns with NIH's Gold Standard Science (GSS), FAIR, and TRUST principles.
  • Reproducibility and transparency are crucial for scientific integrity and validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the benefits of sharing research code in open access, version-controlled repositories.
  • To emphasize how code sharing supports scientific transparency, reproducibility, and collaboration.

Main Methods:

  • Focuses on the practice of depositing versioned, environment-specific code releases in companion repositories.
  • Advocates for pairing code releases with cited data snapshots in research articles.

Main Results:

  • Open code sharing enhances scientific reproducibility by allowing direct verification of results by readers and reviewers.
  • Facilitates collaborative innovation by enabling extension of code to new datasets and applications.
  • Increases researcher visibility, credibility, and citation impact, fostering trust and collaboration.

Conclusions:

  • Openly sharing research code is integral to Gold Standard Science, promoting transparency and trust.
  • Code sharing enhances the scientific ecosystem by improving reproducibility and fostering collaboration.
  • Researchers benefit from increased recognition and opportunities through transparent code sharing practices.