Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
IVUS, OCT, or Angiography as Guidance for PCI in Complex Coronary Artery Lesions: Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized
Pedro E P Carvalho1, Vanio L J Antunes2, Vinicius Bittar de Pontes3
1Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Insights
Intravascular imaging guidance, including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), significantly reduces major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in complex coronary lesions compared to angiography alone. Both OCT- and IVUS-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prove superior for complex lesions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is known to reduce cardiovascular events.
- Limited data exists comparing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) against angiography in complex coronary lesions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of IVUS- and OCT-guided PCI versus angiography-guided PCI in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
- To analyze outcomes in specific complex coronary lesion subgroups.
Main Methods:
- A lesion-level network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted.
- Data from MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for trials comparing OCT, IVUS, and angiography for PCI guidance with drug-eluting stents (DES).
- A frequentist random-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) for MACE, defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.
Main Results:
- Seventeen trials involving 13,751 patients with complex coronary lesions were analyzed.
- Both OCT (RR: 0.63) and IVUS (RR: 0.67) significantly reduced MACE compared to angiography-guided PCI.
- These benefits were consistent across subgroups including chronic total occlusions, left main disease, bifurcation lesions, multivessel disease, and calcified lesions. No significant difference in MACE was found between OCT and IVUS.
Conclusions:
- OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI are more effective than angiography-guided PCI in reducing MACE for patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing PCI with DES.
- Intravascular imaging guidance is recommended for PCI in complex coronary lesions.
Background:
Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces cardiovascular events compared with angiography-guided PCI alone. However, there is a paucity of data comparing these approaches in patients with complex coronary artery lesions and their respective subgroups.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided and optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PCI on reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared with angiography-guided PCI in different complex lesions subsets.
Methods:
In this lesion-level network meta-analysis, the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes following intravascular imaging-guided or angiography-guided PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES). OCT, IVUS, and angiography were separately compared as guidance for PCI. Using a frequentist random-effects model network meta-analysis, RRs with corresponding 95% CIs were calculated for each strategy. The primary endpoint was MACE, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.
Results:
Seventeen randomized controlled trials, encompassing 13,751 patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing PCI with DES were incorporated into the analysis. In the network comparison, both OCT (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.55-0.72; P < 0.001) and IVUS (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.56-0.79; P < 0.001) demonstrated superiority over angiography-guided PCI in preventing MACE in complex lesions. These results were consistent in the subgroups of patients with chronic total occlusions, left main coronary artery disease, bifurcation lesions, multivessel coronary artery disease, and moderately or severely calcified lesions. No significant difference in MACE was observed between OCT and IVUS (RR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.78-1.14; P = 0.52).
Conclusions:
In patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing PCI with DES, both OCT-guided PCI and IVUS-guided PCI are more effective at reducing MACE compared with angiography-guided PCI. These findings were consistent across various types of complex coronary lesions and suggest that intravascular imaging-guided PCI should be the preferred approach for this population.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
06:18Intravascular Ultrasound Image-Based Finite Element Modeling Approach for Quantifying In Vivo Mechanical Properties of Human Coronary Artery
Published on: December 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Angina IV: Management