Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social Determinants of Health and Impact on Cochlear Implant Performance.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2026
Same author

In Response to Validation of Non-Soundproof Tablet Audiometry in Pediatrics: Comparison With Traditional Audiometry.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

Simultaneous multielectrode recordings along the human scala tympani: Evidence for level-dependent place coding.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Validation of Non-Soundproof Tablet Audiometry in Pediatrics: Comparison With Traditional Audiometry.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

Opioid Dependency After Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Surgery.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same author

Immunotherapy Prescribing Patterns and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same journal

International Trends in Head and Neck Cancer Mortality.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Dynamic Quality-of-Life Trajectories After Head and Neck Reconstruction.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Smell and Taste Disturbances Among Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Users.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Weight Loss at a Cost-Sense and Sensibility.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence-Based Risk Prediction Models for Complications After Tongue Cancer Surgery.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Recurrent Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
See all related articles
  1. Home
  3. Cochlear Implant Candidacy Support Tool Using Conjunctive Consolidation.
  1. Home
  3. Cochlear Implant Candidacy Support Tool Using Conjunctive Consolidation.

Related Experiment Video

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

801

Cochlear Implant Candidacy Support Tool Using Conjunctive Consolidation.

Kevin Chen1, William Bray1, Dorina Kallogjeri1,2

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.

JAMA Otolaryngology-- Head & Neck Surgery
|January 15, 2026

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new 4-stage system using routine audiometric data effectively stratifies cochlear implant candidacy likelihood in adults with hearing loss. This approach moves beyond binary screening to support personalized, data-driven patient-clinician decision-making.

More Related Videos

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

760
Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

801
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

760
Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Otolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cochlear implant (CI) utilization remains suboptimal despite proven benefits.
  • Current screening relies on binary classification, hindering personalized patient counseling and shared decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a risk stratification system for CI candidacy using routine audiometric data.
  • To enable individualized estimates of CI candidacy likelihood and improve shared decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary academic center.
  • Developed a 4-stage audiometric severity classification combining pure tone average (PTA) and word recognition score (WRS) using consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) criteria.
  • Assessed discriminative power using the C statistic; secondary analysis used AzBio sentence scores.

Main Results:

  • 782 of 1312 (59.6%) adults met CI candidacy criteria (CNC ≤50%).
  • The 4-stage system demonstrated a clear gradient of candidacy likelihood (2.8%–88.5%) with strong discrimination (C=0.83).
  • Similar strong discrimination was observed using AzBio scores (C=0.80); demographic factors did not improve model performance.

Conclusions:

  • Routine audiometric data can effectively stratify patients by likelihood of cochlear implant candidacy.
  • The 4-level classification system provides a simple, intuitive method for estimating candidacy probability.
  • This system facilitates personalized, data-driven decision-making beyond binary screening.