Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

08:45
Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
14.0K
Surface Quality of Direct Composite Resin Restorations Fabricated Using Different Resin Injection Guides
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
|January 16, 2026
Summary
Resin injection guides (RIGs) improve composite resin restoration quality. 3D-printed guides (FR, RG) offer superior microhardness and conversion degree compared to freehand or PVS methods, though surface roughness varies.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Restorative Dentistry
Background:
- Direct composite resin restorations are fundamental in modern dentistry.
- Achieving optimal surface properties and material integrity is crucial for restoration longevity.
- The oxygen inhibition layer can negatively affect the surface properties of composite resins.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of various resin injection guides (RIGs) on surface roughness (Ra), microhardness (MH), and conversion degree (CD) of direct composite restorations.
- To compare the performance of freehand filling against different types of RIGs.
- To determine which RIG design yields the best material properties for composite restorations.
Main Methods:
- Disc-shaped specimens were fabricated using five methods: freehand (FH), polyester strip (PS), polyvinyl siloxane guide (PVS), flexible resin guide with rigid shell (FR), and rigid resin guide (RG).
- Surface roughness (Ra) was assessed using a tribometer.
- Microhardness (MH) and conversion degree (CD) were measured using a microhardness tester and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, respectively.
- Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and post hoc tests.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in surface roughness were observed, with the order PS < FH < PVS < FR < RG.
- The polyester strip (PS), flexible resin (FR), and rigid resin (RG) guides showed comparable, high microhardness and conversion degree.
- These values were significantly higher than those achieved with freehand (FH) and polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) methods.
- The PVS group demonstrated higher microhardness and conversion degree than the freehand group.
Conclusions:
- Resin injection guides effectively prevent the oxygen inhibition layer, enhancing microhardness and conversion degree by up to 22% compared to freehand placement.
- While all RIGs increased surface roughness relative to the polyester strip, the PVS guide yielded the smoothest surfaces among the tested guides.
- 3D-printed guides (FR, RG) demonstrated superior microhardness and conversion degree compared to the PVS guide and freehand technique.
Related Concept Videos
Accelerators
Accelerators in concrete serve as admixtures to speed up the hardening process, enabling the concrete to achieve early strength faster. Although accelerators do not necessarily impact the time it takes concrete to set, they reduce this time in practice. A common accelerator is calcium chloride, which is particularly useful for hastening early strength development in cold weather or for rapid repair jobs that require quick heat generation after mixing.
The effectiveness of calcium chloride can...
The effectiveness of calcium chloride can...
Retarders
Retarders are chemical admixtures designed to extend the setting time, which is especially useful when there is a delay in sequential concrete pours to prevent cold joints and to achieve a cohesive structure. Retarders, when used in appropriate amounts, can also enhance the architectural appearance of exposed aggregate finishes.
The function of retarders is to delay the setting of concrete, and this effect can be measured using a penetration test. The retardation process involves adding...
The function of retarders is to delay the setting of concrete, and this effect can be measured using a penetration test. The retardation process involves adding...

