Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

63.9K
Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
63.9K
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules02:35

Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules

19.2K
19.2K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

9.9K
9.9K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

14.9K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
14.9K
Bond Dissociation Energy and Activation Energy02:13

Bond Dissociation Energy and Activation Energy

10.7K
Bond energy is the energy required to break a bond homolytically. These values are usually expressed in units of kcal/mol or kJ/mol and are referred to as bond dissociation energies when given for specific bonds or average bond energies when indicated for a given type of bond over many compounds. Firstly, the bond dissociation energy for a single bond is weaker than that of a double bond, which in turn is weaker than that of a triple bond. Secondly, hydrogen forms relatively strong bonds with...
10.7K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.0K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuroticism, perceived stress, psychological resilience, and pre-dive state anxiety in professional divers: a cross-sectional study.

BMC psychology·2026
Same author

A Prospective Study of Definitive ChemoRadiation With ImmunOtherapy (CRIO) in Locally or Regionally Advanced, Unresectable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Advances in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Use of clips to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding in non-pedunculated colorectal lesions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

One-step synthesis of V/Fe bimetallic nanozymes with synergistic activity for dual-mode detection of organophosphorus pesticides.

Biosensors & bioelectronics·2026
Same author

Long-term outcomes of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for primary kidney cancer (TROG 15.03 FASTRACK II): a multicentre, non-randomised, phase 2 study.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Ultra-hypofractionated stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: 5-year outcomes from a pooled analysis of the FASTRACK trials.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same journal

Probing Charge-Controlled Inter-Domain Flexibility: Integrating Experimental and Coarse-Grained Approaches.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

FragScan: A Quantitative Fragment Scanning Strategy for Rational Drug Discovery.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

GeoPep: A Geometry-Aware Masked Language Model for Protein-Peptide Binding Site Prediction.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Interaction Persistence-Based Identification of Key Binding Residues in the Cellular Retinol-Binding Protein 1 Complex.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Tree-Guided Graph Neural Networks with Multilevel Optimization for Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

ASO-RASAR: A Read-Across Framework for Predicting Antisense Oligonucleotide Gapmer Activity Across Target Genes.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions
09:15

Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions

Published on: November 21, 2017

8.7K

A Relative Binding Free Energy Framework for Structurally Dissimilar Molecules.

Hsu-Chun Tsai1, Shi Zhang2, Tai-Sung Lee2

  • 1TandemAI, New York, New York 10036, United States.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|January 17, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Core-hopping binding free energy (CBFE) calculations offer an efficient method for predicting drug potency. This new approach accurately determines relative binding free energies for molecules with diverse structures, improving drug discovery efficiency.

More Related Videos

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.6K
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions
09:15

Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions

Published on: November 21, 2017

8.7K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.6K
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Molecular modeling

Background:

  • Relative binding free energy (RBFE) calculations are vital for drug discovery but limited to molecules with similar structures.
  • Traditional RBFE methods struggle with diverse small molecules lacking a common core or binding mode.
  • Absolute binding free energy (ABFE) methods can handle diverse molecules but are computationally expensive and converge slowly.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a computationally efficient framework, core-hopping binding free energy (CBFE) calculations, for determining relative binding free energies.
  • To enable accurate predictions for small molecules with different cores and binding modes, overcoming limitations of traditional RBFE.
  • To provide a practical tool for challenging drug discovery campaigns involving diverse chemical structures.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel CBFE framework leveraging Alchemical Enhanced Sampling (ACES) with optimized transformation pathways and flexible λ-spacing.
  • Incorporated λ-dependent Boresch restraints to enhance sampling and accuracy.
  • Implemented and benchmarked CBFE across 4 protein systems with 56 small molecules using GPU-accelerated AMBER (pmemd.cuda).

Main Results:

  • CBFE results showed consistency with RBFE for congeneric ligands.
  • CBFE offered significant improvements in computational cost and precision compared to ABFE for diverse small molecules.
  • The method demonstrated accuracy and efficiency in determining relative binding free energies across different molecular scaffolds and binding modes.

Conclusions:

  • CBFE calculations provide an accurate and computationally efficient method for determining relative binding free energies between small molecules with diverse cores.
  • This approach expands the applicability of binding free energy calculations to a wider range of molecules in drug discovery.
  • The CBFE framework is fully implemented in AMBER, making it readily available for researchers.