Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Quantifying the Effects of Antimicrobials on In vitro Biofilm Architecture using COMSTAT Software
Published on: December 14, 2020
Antimicrobial effects of four different probiotic compositions and delivery forms on clear aligner biofilm: A
Vikas Thakur1, Achint Juneja1, Monis Raza1
1Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Institute of Dental Studies & Technologies, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Background:
To evaluate the short-term antimicrobial effects of consumer probiotic formulations on bacterial load and biofilm accumulation on clear orthodontic aligners using a randomized four-period crossover design.
Methods:
Twenty Invisalign users completed four 7-day intervention periods separated by 14-day washouts. Interventions comprised: (1) probiotic gummy (Bonatona; Bacillus coagulans, 1.5 × 10⁹ CFU/dose), (2) probiotic rinse (Perfora; proprietary multi-strain blend, 1.5 × 10⁹ CFU/10 mL), (3) probiotic capsule (HealthKart; multi-strain, 3.0 × 10¹⁰ CFU/dose), and (4) probiotic drink (Yakult Original; Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Shirota, ∼6.5 × 10⁹ CFU/65 mL). Products were used as labelled; Labelled strains included Bacillus coagulans, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Shirota, and proprietary multi-strain Lactobacillus/Bifidobacterium blends (10⁹-10¹⁰ CFU/dose). No independent verification of strain identity or viability was undertaken. After each period, 5-mm discs from standardized aligner sites were analysed for total viable counts (CFU/mL) and for biofilm matrix (EPS) and viability using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) with Concanavalin A staining. Primary analysis used linear mixed-effects models with treatment, period, and sequence as fixed effects and subject as a random intercept. Least-squares means (95 % CI) and Bonferroni-adjusted contrasts are reported. Trial registered at CTRI/2024/08/072820.
Results:
All four probiotic delivery forms produced significant reductions in total viable counts and EPS fluorescence compared with pre-intervention controls (P < 0.001). CFU reductions ranged from 0.62-1.06 log₁₀ (mean reduction 3.8-4.3 × 10³ CFU/mL), with the probiotic drink showing the largest decrease (LS-mean difference vs. baseline = 1.055 log₁₀ CFU; 95% CI: 0.93-1.18; P < 0.001). Similar reductions were observed in CLSM fluorescence (mean differences 93-145 AU; all P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Short-term use of consumer probiotics delivered as a drink, rinse, gummy, or capsule, demonstrated statistically significant antimicrobial reductions in aligner biofilm. The probiotic drink yielded the greatest effect. Given the short intervention duration and label-only verification of probiotic content, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary. Larger, species-resolved studies with longer follow-up and comparison against routine mechanical cleaning are needed before clinical recommendations can be established.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
06:18Quantifying the Effects of Antimicrobials on In vitro Biofilm Architecture using COMSTAT Software
07:16Development of a Polymicrobial Colony Biofilm Model to Test Antimicrobials in Cystic Fibrosis
08:36The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
04:26Growing Mycobacterial Biofilm as a Model to Study Antimicrobial Resistance
Inattentional Blindness
We generally think that we see things pretty well if they are close by and right in front of us. But do we? We know that visual attention is a property of the human brain that controls what parts of the visual world we process, and how effectively. Limited attention means that we can't process everything at once, it turns out, even things that might be right in front of us.
In the 1960s, the renowned cognitive psychologist...
Antimicrobial Effectiveness

