Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Novel Object Recognition Test for the Investigation of Learning and Memory in Mice
Published on: August 30, 2017
Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Posterior Fossa Abnormality Recognition on First-Trimester US Screening
Alessandra Familiari1,2, Chiara Di Ilio1, Andrea Dall'Asta3
1Department of Women and Child Health, Women Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
None:
Purpose To develop a deep learning algorithm to automatically assess the posterior fossa on first-trimester US screening scans and identify open spina bifida (OSB) and cystic posterior fossa (CPF) anomalies. Materials and Methods This was the retrospective part of an international study involving 10 fetal medicine centers. Normal and abnormal (OSB, CPF anomaly) midsagittal fetal brain US images acquired between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation (July 2009-January 2024) with confirmed diagnosis at follow-up were evaluated. Images were manually annotated to delineate the posterior fossa. The dataset was split into a training/validation set (70%) and internal test set (30%). Three convolutional neural networks were trained via threefold cross-validation on the training/validation set, with predictions on the internal test set obtained by ensemble averaging across folds. Model performance in detecting OSB and CPF anomalies was evaluated for the whole cohort and for fetuses with OSB or CPF anomalies separately. Results Images from 251 fetuses were analyzed (mean gestational age [±SD], 12.7 weeks ± 0.65; 150 normal and 101 abnormal [43 OSB and 58 CPF anomalies] images). On the internal test, the MobileNetV3 Large Weights achieved the best performance: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.99); accuracy, 88% (67 of 76); recall, 81% (25 of 31); specificity, 93% (42 of 45); precision, 89% (25 of 28); negative predictive value, 88% (42 of 48); and F1 score, 0.85. OSB was classified more accurately (93% [52 of 56] vs 88% [57 of 65]; P = .38) and with higher recall (91% [10 of 11] vs 75% [15 of 20]), although the difference was not significant (P = .38). Conclusion MobileNetV3 Large Weights accurately assessed the fetal posterior fossa between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation, distinguishing normal images from those showing OSB or CPF anomalies. Clinical trial registration no. NCT0579047 Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, First Trimester Ultrasound Screening, Fetal Brain Anomalies, Deep Learning Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2026 See also commentary by Rafful in this issue.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Leaky Scanning
Abnormal Proliferation
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding I: Inspection and Percussion
Inspection Findings
During an inspection, several findings may suggest the presence of respiratory distress or disease. Pursed-lip breathing, where exhalation is slowed by...
Cardiovascular System Abnormal Findings I: Inspection and Palpation
Abnormal findings observed during an inspection

