Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Building Double-decker Traps for Early Detection of Emerald Ash Borer
Published on: October 4, 2017
A recent ash dieback infection neither affects emerald ash borer performance nor triggers a substantial systemic
Michael Eisenring1, Amanda D Roe2, Valentin Queloz1
1Forest Health and Biotic Interactions, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Abstract:
The number of non-native invasive species has increased markedly in recent decades, raising the likelihood of co-occurrence and interactions among invaders. Such interactions may exacerbate impacts on native ecosystems, making it essential to understand co-invasion dynamics for effective pest management and conservation. European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) is simultaneously threatened by two invasive species: The fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, which causes ash dieback (ADB), and the emerald ash borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis, a phloem-feeding beetle. Although their invaded ranges overlap in parts of eastern Europe, it remains unclear how these species interact within the same host. We investigated whether recent ADB stem infections affect EAB performance, and whether such effects are mediated by changes in ash phytochemistry. Our findings indicate that neither larval nor adult EAB performance was affected when feeding on ADB-infected trees. Phloem chemistry showed localized changes near the ADB infection front but remained unaltered 18-20 cm away. Also leaf chemistry was only minimally affected by an ADB stem infection. These limited systemic responses suggest that F. excelsior relies primarily on constitutive phytochemical defenses against ADB. Therefore, ADB-induced phytochemical changes in recently infected trees do not affect EAB performance. We conclude that freshly ADB-infected trees neither promote nor inhibit EAB development. From a pest management standpoint, immediate sanitary removal of ADB-infected trees may not be necessary in stands only recently affected by the pathogen, as potential beneficial ADB infection effects on EAB are unlikely. However, the long-term impact of chronic ADB stress on EAB dynamics remains uncertain and warrants further investigation.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10340-025-01981-4.
Related Concept Videos
Defense Mechanism Against Infection
In addition, many body organ systems have unique defenses against infection. The skin is an intact, multilayered surface preventing invasion by microorganisms unless impaired. Mucous membranes lining the mouth, nose, and eyelids are barriers...
Humoral Immune Responses
Defenses Against Pathogens and Herbivores
Defense Against Bacterial Pathogens
Phagocytes
Phagocytes are the frontline soldiers of the immune system. They include neutrophils and macrophages. Neutrophils are the most abundant type of white blood cell and are quickly mobilized to the site of infection. Macrophages are larger cells that patrol...
Second Order systems II
Responses to Gravity and Touch

