Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
Clinical Outcomes of Single-Piece Zirconia Implants Compared With Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A
Aditi Kanitkar1, Priyanka Jadhav1, Ameer Akhil Ahmed Shaik2
1Prosthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, IND.
Introduction:
Replacement of a single missing tooth with evolving treatment alternatives remains a common clinical challenge. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the treatment duration and prosthetic/biological complication rates between single-piece zirconia implants and conventional tooth-supported three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) over a minimum three-year follow-up.
Materials And Methods:
This study included 200 patients (100 per group) treated between 2018 and 2022 for a single missing mandibular premolar or molar. The implant group received one-piece zirconia implants with immediate/early restoration, whereas the FDP group received porcelain-fused-to-metal or monolithic zirconia three-unit bridges. The treatment duration, number of visits, and complications were retrieved from clinical records. Complication-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression.
Results:
Single-piece implants required significantly longer treatment times (157.1 ± 48.3 vs. 46.6 ± 18.9 days; p<0.001) and more clinical visits (5.2 ± 1.1 vs. 3.0 ± 0.8; p<0.001) than FDPs. Overall, prosthetic complication rates were similar (p=0.689), but complication-free survival was significantly higher in the implant group according to the log-rank test (p=0.028), with 56 (56%) implant patients versus 36 (36%) FDP patients remaining complication-free throughout follow-up. The mean time to the first complication or censoring was longer for implants (680.4 vs. 592.3 days; p = 0.024). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that restoration type was not an independent predictor of complication risk (p = 0.346) once complications occurred.
Conclusion:
Single-piece zirconia implants, despite requiring a longer treatment duration and more appointments, offered superior mid-term complication-free survival compared with conventional three-unit FDPs for replacing a single mandibular posterior tooth. When the preservation of sound adjacent teeth is prioritized, single-piece zirconia implants represent a biologically favorable option for suitable patients.
Related Concept Videos
Oxygen Delivering System III: Tracheostomy and T-piece
Tracheostomy
A tracheostomy is a surgically created opening (stoma) in the anterior part of the trachea. It is used to establish a patient airway, bypass an upper airway obstruction, simplify the removal of secretions, permit long-term...
Tooth Anatomy
The Crown, Neck, and Root
The visible part of the tooth is referred to as the crown. It's covered by enamel, the hardest substance in the human body. The crown is uniquely shaped for each type of tooth, allowing for different functions such as cutting, tearing, or...
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Fixing Double-strand Breaks

