Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

31.4K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
31.4K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

50.9K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
50.9K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.7K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures03:34

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

80.8K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
80.8K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

10.4K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
10.4K
Conditioned Taste Aversion01:14

Conditioned Taste Aversion

561
Conditioned taste aversion, also known as sauce béarnaise syndrome, is a phenomenon in which an individual develops an aversion to a certain food taste following a negative experience, typically illness. This form of aversion is a type of classical conditioning in which the taste of the food (conditioned stimulus, CS) is associated with the experience of illness (unconditioned stimulus, UCS).
A notable characteristic of conditioned taste aversion is that it often requires only a single...
561

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A comprehensive pharmacological survey across heterogeneous patient-derived glioblastoma stem cell models.

iScience·2026
Same author

Identification of drug candidates against glioblastoma with machine learning and high-throughput screening of heterogeneous cellular models.

Digital discovery·2026
Same author

Multiobjective Design of Growth Media with Genome-Scale Metabolic Models and Bayesian Optimization.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same author

Optimization of regulatory DNA with active learning.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2025
Same author

Accurate prediction of gene deletion phenotypes with Flux Cone Learning.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Modeling host-pathway dynamics at the genome scale with machine learning.

Metabolic engineering·2025
Same journal

Glycoform engineering of a mammalian platform to sculpt a humanized recombinant bioscavenger.

Cell systems·2026
Same journal

Targeted genomic editing of human gut Bacteroides species based on CRISPR-associated transposases.

Cell systems·2026
Same journal

Scalable enumeration and sampling of minimal metabolic pathways for organisms and communities.

Cell systems·2026
Same journal

Deciphering protein mutation-phenotype linkages from CRISPR-based tiling mutagenesis screens.

Cell systems·2026
Same journal

High-throughput machine learning-aided antibody discovery for cell surface antigens.

Cell systems·2026
Same journal

Quantitative cytokine profiling of primary human macrophages reveals distinct single-cell modes of trained immunity.

Cell systems·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.4K

Risk-averse optimization of genetic circuits under uncertainty.

Michal Kobiela1, Diego A Oyarzún2, Michael U Gutmann1

  • 1School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK.

Cell Systems
|January 22, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel computational method combining Bayesian inference, Thompson sampling, and risk management to optimize biological circuit design. The approach mitigates model inaccuracies, improving the success rate of engineered biological systems.

Keywords:
Thompson samplingautomated designgenetic circuitsmachine learningrisk-averse optimizationrisk-managementrobustnesssynthetic biologyuncertainty quantification

More Related Videos

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
09:38

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

Published on: November 14, 2017

15.6K
A Caenorhabditis elegans Nutritional-status Based Copper Aversion Assay
06:45

A Caenorhabditis elegans Nutritional-status Based Copper Aversion Assay

Published on: July 26, 2017

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.4K
Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
09:38

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

Published on: November 14, 2017

15.6K
A Caenorhabditis elegans Nutritional-status Based Copper Aversion Assay
06:45

A Caenorhabditis elegans Nutritional-status Based Copper Aversion Assay

Published on: July 26, 2017

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Synthetic biology
  • Computational biology
  • Bioengineering

Background:

  • Engineering biological systems requires navigating complex design spaces, often limited by wet-lab experimentation.
  • Mathematical modeling and computational optimization accelerate design but suffer from inherent model inaccuracies, leading to suboptimal in vivo performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust computational framework for designing functional biological circuits by addressing model uncertainty.
  • To improve the prediction accuracy and in vivo performance of engineered biological systems.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Bayesian inference to estimate the distribution of model parameters from non-functional designs.
  • Employed Thompson sampling and risk-averse optimization to select robust design parameters.
  • Validated the approach on adaptation circuits and genetic oscillators using diverse model complexities and data types.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively estimates parameter distributions and identifies optimal, risk-averse designs.
  • Demonstrated successful application in designing both adaptation circuits and genetic oscillators.
  • Showcased the approach's versatility across various model complexities and data sources.

Conclusions:

  • The integration of Bayesian inference, Thompson sampling, and risk management offers a powerful strategy for de-risking biological circuit design.
  • This computational approach enhances the reliability and efficiency of engineering functional biological systems.
  • The method provides a pathway to more predictable and successful synthetic biology applications.