Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
Published on: July 19, 2019
Setting priorities for how future research in multiple sclerosis in Canada considers equity, diversity and inclusion:
Ruth Ann Marrie1, Afolasade Fakolade2, Colleen J Maxwell3
1Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada; Department of Medicine, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Future multiple sclerosis (MS) research in Canada needs to prioritize equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI). This study identified key areas for improvement in MS research to ensure better representation and outcomes for all individuals affected by the disease.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Public Health
- Health Research Methodology
Background:
- Multiple sclerosis (MS) research historically lacks diverse participant representation.
- Addressing inequities in MS research is crucial for comprehensive understanding and treatment.
- Current research paradigms may not adequately capture the experiences of all populations affected by MS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish consensus on priorities for enhancing equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in Canadian multiple sclerosis (MS) research.
- To identify actionable strategies for improving EDI within the MS research landscape.
- To guide future research funding and policy decisions in MS.
Main Methods:
- A modified e-Delphi technique was employed, involving three rounds of surveys.
- Participants included individuals with lived experience (people with MS or family members), EDI researchers, and MS clinicians.
- Surveys focused on five domains: diversity measurement, recruitment strategies, and the roles of funders and publishers, alongside training needs.
Main Results:
- Eighty-seven participants completed the initial survey, with high retention rates across subsequent rounds (82 and 81 participants).
- Forty-five consensus-driven items were identified across the five domains, indicating strong agreement on priorities.
- The majority of consensus items were deemed achievable, suggesting practical implementation is feasible.
Conclusions:
- This study successfully identified critical priorities for integrating EDI into Canadian MS research.
- The findings provide a roadmap for researchers, funders, and institutions to foster more inclusive research practices.
- Implementing these priorities can lead to more equitable and effective advancements in multiple sclerosis care and outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Equity Theory
Inclusive Fitness
Cell Inclusions
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Diversity of Archaea I
Diversity of Archaea II

