Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Digital vs. Direct Anthropometry with MetiSmile® 3D Face Scanner: A Validation and Reliability Study on a Mannequin
Alexander De Crem1, Constantijn Bogaert2, Frederik Piccart3
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Head and Neck Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium; alexander.decrem@uzbrussel.be (A.D.C.); matthias.ureel@uzgent.be (M.U.); benjamin.denoiseux@uzgent.be (B.D.); lisa.dekock@uzgent.be (L.D.K.).
The MetiSmile® 3D face scanner offers reproducible meshes and accurate linear measurements for orthodontic and orthognathic applications. Further validation on live subjects is recommended before widespread clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging
- Orthodontics
Background:
- Three-dimensional facial anthropometry is crucial in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
- Conventional systems (e.g., Vectra®, 3dMD®) are accurate but expensive and complex.
- The MetiSmile® scanner presents a cost-effective, portable alternative requiring validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To rigorously evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the MetiSmile® 3D face scanner.
- To compare digital measurements with direct anthropometry.
- To assess intra- and inter-observer reliability.
Main Methods:
- Two-phase validation on a mannequin head.
- Phase 1: Mesh reproducibility under varying lighting and refinement (AL, n-AL, AL-F) using Iterative Closest Point (ICP).
- Phase 2: Direct Anthropometry (DA) vs. Digital Anthropometry (DiA) measurements by three observers, assessing reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
Main Results:
- Phase 1 showed high mesh reproducibility with mean root-mean-square error (RMS) as low as 0.030 mm (AL-F).
- Largest deviations observed near facial features like eyes and lips.
- Phase 2 demonstrated excellent ICCs (≥0.997) and minimal mean absolute DA-DiA differences (0.25-0.33 mm).
Conclusions:
- The MetiSmile® scanner produces highly reproducible 3D facial meshes.
- Linear measurements obtained are clinically acceptable for mannequin models.
- Further validation on live subjects is necessary for routine clinical adoption.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Distribution Reliability and Automation
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...

