Impact of AI-assisted decision support on radiological diagnosis of jawbone lesions
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Cortisol Extraction from Sturgeon Fin and Jawbone Matrices
Published on: September 10, 2019
Jonas Ver Berne1,2, Soroush Baseri Saadi3, Maria Fernanda Silva da Andrade-Bortoletto3,4
1OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Leuven, 3000, Belgium. jonas.verberne@gmail.com.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in dentomaxillofacial radiology, with most research focusing on image-based lesion detection and classification. Little is known about how clinicians perform when assisted by knowledge-based diagnostic tools, such as statistical models and generative large language models. This study aimed to evaluate whether AI-assisted decision support can enhance clinicians’ accuracy in diagnosing jawbone lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared the diagnostic performance of three general dentists and three dentomaxillofacial radiologists interpreting 25 jawbone lesion cases under three conditions: unaided, assisted by ORAD (a statistical model), and assisted by RAISE (a retrieval-augmented generative AI tool). Diagnostic accuracy was compared using generalized estimating equations, and human-machine agreement was calculated. RESULTS: Dentists’ accuracy improved from 53% unaided to 67% with ORAD but decreased to 49% with RAISE. Dentomaxillofacial radiologists performed consistently high across the three conditions (81% unaided, 88% with ORAD, and 84% with RAISE) and significantly outperformed dentists in all conditions (p ≤ 0.002). Among dentists, using ORAD significantly outperformed RAISE (p = 0.033). Human-machine agreement was moderate for both tools. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, ORAD support modestly improved dentists’ diagnostic accuracy, although not statistically significant, whereas generative AI did not show measurable benefit. Dentomaxillofacial radiologists’ performance was unaffected by either tool. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Generative AI tools relying solely on user input may have limited clinical utility for jawbone lesion diagnosis. Future AI systems should integrate image-based analysis with adaptive, interactive reasoning to better augment clinical decision-making. In its present form, decision-support tools seem more useful for dentists than dentomaxillofacial radiologists.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Impact of Groups on Groups
Nursing Diagnosis
The nursing diagnosis focuses on evidence-based...
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...

