Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

07:21
Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 27, 2022
3.6K
Latent Variable Indirect Response Modeling of Cendakimab Exposure-Response for Longitudinal Dysphagia Days Using a
Shengnan Du1, Jessica Wojciechowski2, Peijin Zhang1
1Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
|January 23, 2026
Summary
Cendakimab effectively reduced dysphagia days (DD) in eosinophilic esophagitis patients. Both weekly and switch-to-every-other-week dosing showed significant improvements compared to placebo at 48 weeks.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacometrics
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by dysphagia.
- Understanding the exposure-response relationship is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the exposure-response (E-R) relationship of cendakimab on dysphagia days (DD) in EoE patients.
- To evaluate the efficacy of different cendakimab dosing regimens.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the EE-001 study (N=427) with eosinophilic esophagitis.
- Employed a latent variable indirect response (IDR) model with a combined uniform-binomial (CUB) distribution to analyze DD.
- Incorporated covariates such as steroid inadequate response/intolerance (Steroid IR/I) and baseline DD.
Main Results:
- Cendakimab exposure was linked to reduced DD.
- Estimated EC50 and EC90 values indicated a steep Emax curve.
- Simulations showed 360 mg QW and QW-to-Q2W regimens reduced DD by ~1.65 and ~1.36 days vs. placebo at Week 48.
- Consistent responses observed across demographics; Steroid IR/I and baseline DD influenced magnitude but not dose.
Conclusions:
- The QW-to-Q2W maintenance posology is effective for cendakimab in EoE.
- Latent variable IDR models are suitable for analyzing bounded, discrete longitudinal endpoints in E-R analyses.
Related Concept Videos
Photoreceptors and Plant Responses to Light
28.4K
Light plays a significant role in regulating the growth and development of plants. In addition to providing energy for photosynthesis, light provides other important cues to regulate a range of developmental and physiological responses in plants.
28.4K
Responses to Gravity and Touch
41.7K
Gravitropism: Plant Responses to Gravity
41.7K
Humoral Immune Responses
83.5K
Overview
83.5K
Responses to Heat and Cold Stress
14.7K
Every organism has an optimum temperature range within which healthy growth and physiological functioning can occur. At the ends of this range, there will be a minimum and maximum temperature that interrupt biological processes.
14.7K
Responses to Drought and Flooding
12.0K
Water plays a significant role in the life cycle of plants. However, insufficient or excess of water can be detrimental and pose a serious threat to plants.
12.0K
Responses to Salt Stress
14.5K
Salt stress—which can be triggered by high salt concentrations in a plant’s environment—can significantly affect plant growth and crop production by influencing photosynthesis and the absorption of water and nutrients.
14.5K

