Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation
Published on: October 14, 2022
[A randomized controlled trial of knotless barbed sutures for wound closure in short-segment posterior lumbar
Y Jiang1, Y Liu1, H J Ouyang1
1Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing 100191, China.
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of knotless barbed sutures for wound closure in elective degenerative short-segment posterior lumbar surgery. Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial study. Patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria undergoing elective posterior lumbar surgery at the Department of Orthopedics,Peking University Third Hospital from March 2024 to May 2025 were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the trial group or the control group using a random number table. Wound closure in the trial group was performed using barbed sutures for the deep fascia, subcutaneous, and intradermal layers; while the control group received conventional sutures. The incision length, deep fascia, subcutaneous, and intradermal wound closure times, and total wound closure time were compared between the two groups, and the suturing speed per unit length was calculated. Postoperative drainage volume, drainage tube removal time, weight of soiled dressings at the first dressing change, total length of hospital stays (LOS), postoperative LOS, wound healing status, and incidence of incision-related complications were recorded. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at the 3-month postoperative follow-up. Data analysis was taken by independent sample t test or Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Results: A total of 114 patients were included in this study. There were 51 males and 63 females,aged (61.1±9.0)years(range:27 to 79 years). There were 57 patients in each group. No significant difference was found in incision length between the two groups ((11.0±1.8) cm vs. (11.1±1.8) cm, t=-0.399, P=0.690). The suturing speed was significantly faster in the trial group than in the control group ((1.1±0.3) min/cm vs. (1.7±0.4) min/cm, t=-7.200, P<0.01). The trial group demonstrated significantly shorter closure times for the deep fascia, subcutaneous, intradermal layer, and total wound closure time compared to the control group (all P<0.01). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of total operative time, total operating room time, postoperative drainage volume, drainage tube removal time, total LOS, or 3-month postoperative JOA, VAS, and ODI scores (all P>0.05). However, the trial group had a significantly shorter postoperative LOS than the control group ((6.0±1.9) d vs. (6.8±2.9) d, t=-2.391 P=0.017). Conclusion: For short-segment posterior lumbar surgery, barbed sutures significantly reduce layered and total wound closure times and decrease postoperative hospitalization, while demonstrating non-inferiority to conventional sutures in operative duration, drainage management, complication rates, and functional outcomes.
More Related Videos
03:24Author Spotlight: Development and Application of a Novel Suture Technique for Annular Fibrosus Repair in Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy
Published on: January 26, 2024
04:42Clinical Application of Microscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Published on: June 16, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Nuclear Fusion
A helium nucleus has a mass that is 0.7% less than that of four hydrogen nuclei; this lost mass is converted into energy during the fusion. This reaction produces about...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Random Error
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...