Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
Published on: May 19, 2015
CASSH Registry: Rationale and Study Design
Mohamad Ezzeldin1, Ali Kerro2, Ameer E Hassan3
1Department of Neuroendovascular Surgery HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood Kingwood TX.
The Carotid Artery Stenting Outcomes in Comprehensive Stroke Hospitals (CASSH) registry evaluates carotid artery stenting (CAS) outcomes. This study highlights the importance of neurointerventionalist expertise in CAS procedures at stroke centers.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Carotid artery disease, particularly atherosclerotic stenosis, is a leading cause of stroke.
- Carotid endarterectomy is the traditional treatment, but carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an alternative for high-risk patients.
- Neurointerventional specialists possess crucial skills for CAS, yet are often underrepresented in studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate outcomes of carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed by neurointerventionalists.
- To address the underrepresentation of neurointerventional expertise in current CAS research.
- To provide comprehensive insights into CAS procedures at comprehensive stroke centers.
Main Methods:
- The CASSH (Carotid Artery Stenting Outcomes in Comprehensive Stroke Hospitals) registry is a multicenter, prospective, observational study.
- Patients with carotid artery stenosis undergoing CAS by neurointerventional physicians are enrolled.
- Data collection includes baseline, procedural, and postoperative clinical and imaging variables.
Main Results:
- Outcomes measured include postoperative symptomatic stroke (hemorrhagic/ischemic), access site complications, in-stent thrombosis, and mortality.
- The registry captures detailed procedural and patient data for comprehensive analysis.
- Results will elucidate complication rates and effectiveness of CAS in a real-world setting.
Conclusions:
- Current literature inadequately represents neurointerventionalists' role and outcomes in CAS.
- The CASSH registry will enhance understanding of CAS management and outcomes.
- Emphasizing neurointerventional expertise in comprehensive stroke centers is key to improving CAS results.
Related Concept Videos
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Group Design
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability

