Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Using Wavelet Entropy to Demonstrate how Mindfulness Practice Increases Coordination between Irregular Cerebral and Cardiac Activities
Published on: May 10, 2017
Wavelet-Based Denoising Optimization for Endoscopic Gastric Slow-Wave Recordings
Peter Tremain1,2, Jarrah M Dowrick1, Leo K Cheng1
1Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand.
None:
New, minimally invasive, endoscopic methods for recording gastric bioelectrical slow waves from the mucosal surface are emerging to address the current limitations of invasive recordings. Filtering techniques for these new methods have relied on protocols developed for invasive recordings. Updated signal processing techniques, such as discrete wavelet transformation (DWT), optimised for endoscopic recording conditions, promise more effective noise removal for these signals. Synthetic signals were constructed using averaged slow-wave data and noise segmented from existing endoscopic gastric bioelectrical recordings from 12 patients. DWT was performed on the synthetic signals using 989 different parameter combinations to remove noise. Savitzky-Golay (SG) filtering was also performed on the synthetic signals to provide a comparative baseline for classical filter performance. Combined SG filtering and DWT was then investigated using the top-performing DWT parameters. Filter performance was evaluated using six established metrics, along with the inspection of the power spectral density (PSD) calculated on sample signals. Statistical significance was analysed using a paired two-tailed Student's t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For signals with moderate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), DWT-based methods outperformed traditional SG filtering in all metrics considered: signal-distortion ratio (0.84 ± 0.45 vs. 1.34 ± 0.99), root-mean-square error (280 ± 150 µV vs. 450 ± 330 µV), percentage root-mean-square difference (78 ± 42% vs. 113 ± 83%), noise-correction ratio (0.94±0.17 vs. 0.50±0.26), SNR improvement (5.9±3.0 dB vs. 2.1±2.7 dB) and filter performance metric (0.96 ± 0.42 vs. 1.8 ± 1.2). All p-values were <0.05. The combination of SG filtering with DWT provided improved signal denoising when compared to SG filtering alone, whilst offering reduced aggressiveness when compared to DWT alone. Inspection of the calculated PSDs for sample signals reaffirmed these results. The results presented in this study indicate that for endoscopic gastric bioelectrical recordings, with moderate SNR, modern denoising techniques based on DWT can outperform traditional SG filtering. More efficient noise removal using DWT can allow for better automated detection of slow-wave activations and more reliable, efficient data processing.
Related Concept Videos
The Wave Nature of Light
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
Gastric Motility
Peristaltic Waves and Chyme Formation
Upon food entry, the stomach initiates...
Gastric Emptying
Gastric Phase of Digestion
When food enters the stomach, it stretches the stomach walls and activates stretch receptors. This triggers local reflexes of the enteric nervous system, mediated through the myenteric plexus. These...

