In Vitro Accuracy Analysis of Intraoral Scanning Strategies: A Comparison of Two Contemporary IOS Systems

Background: Digital intraoral scanning has become an essential component of modern restorative dentistry, offering enhanced accuracy, workflow efficiency, and patient comfort compared to conventional impression techniques. Despite these advantages, the accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOS) can be affected by multiple parameters, among which scanning strategy and device design are particularly influential. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effect of different scanning strategies on scan accuracy and precision, focusing on two widely used intraoral scanners (Medit i700 and Trios 5) in a controlled in vitro environment. Materials and Methods: A standardized digital test object was created according to ISO 20896-1 specifications to ensure uniformity and comparability. The object was printed using a high-precision 3D printer and scanned multiple times with both IOS systems, employing distinct scanning strategies under identical environmental conditions. Data analysis was performed using descriptive and comparative statistics, including Mean, Median, Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Standard Deviation (SD), and Variance, to evaluate trueness and precision. Results: The Medit i700 consistently exhibited lower deviation values and greater precision compared with the Trios 5, reflecting higher trueness and precision. Scanning strategy influenced scan outcomes; structured, systematic scanning paths produced more stable and accurate datasets. The Trios 5 demonstrated higher variability, suggesting increased sensitivity to operator motion and scanning trajectory. Conclusions: Both the scanner type and scanning strategy substantially affect intraoral scan accuracy. The superior performance of the Medit i700 indicates greater robustness and operator-independent stability. Clinically, these results underscore the importance of standardized scanning protocols, as operator consistency may be a key determinant of digital impression accuracy and, consequently, of clinical outcomes.