Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating HR-Dependent Cardiac Function in Mouse Models Through a Novel Atrial-Pacing Approach
Published on: July 21, 2023
Challenges of Classifying Stage B Heart Failure in a High-Risk Population
Alice C Cowley1,2, Abhishek Dattani1,2, Jian L Yeo1,2
1Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.
Insights
Current guidelines for Stage B heart failure (SBHF) lack specificity. Refining criteria with sex- and ethnic-specific thresholds may better identify individuals at risk for symptomatic disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Diabetes Research
Background:
- Stage B heart failure (SBHF) poses a significant risk for developing symptomatic heart failure (HF).
- Existing diagnostic criteria for SBHF lack sex and ethnic specificity, and defined thresholds for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.
- There is a need to assess SBHF prevalence in diverse populations and refine diagnostic criteria.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prevalence of SBHF in a large cohort of individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and healthy controls.
- To propose refined, sex- and ethnic-specific CMR imaging criteria for diagnosing SBHF.
- To compare patient characteristics and exercise capacity between Stage A and Stage B HF classifications.
Main Methods:
- Derived sex- and ethnic-specific thresholds from 373 healthy controls using CMR cine imaging.
- Applied current and refined SBHF criteria to a cohort of asymptomatic individuals with T2D and to historical cohorts with symptomatic cardiovascular disease (aortic stenosis and HFpEF).
- Calculated SBHF prevalence, compared patient characteristics including exercise capacity, and assessed cardiac remodeling in symptomatic cohorts.
Main Results:
- Current criteria identified 91% of T2D individuals and 69% of healthy controls as SBHF, indicating poor specificity.
- Refined criteria, incorporating sex- and ethnicity-specific thresholds and echo/CMR measures, reduced SBHF prevalence to 30% in the T2D cohort.
- Individuals classified with refined Stage B HF exhibited lower exercise capacity compared to Stage A HF (81% vs. 91% predicted maximal oxygen consumption, p < 0.001).
- The refined criteria identified abnormal cardiac remodeling in 89% of severe aortic stenosis and 85% of HFpEF participants.
Conclusions:
- Current SBHF guideline criteria are non-specific and have limited clinical utility.
- Sex- and ethnic-specific thresholds can enhance the identification of individuals at risk for symptomatic heart failure.
- Further research is necessary to validate the proposed refined criteria for SBHF diagnosis.
Background:
Stage B heart failure (SBHF) increases the risk of symptomatic HF. Current guideline criteria for SBHF lack sex and ethnic thresholding and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging cut-offs. We aimed to assess the prevalence of SBHF in a large cohort of people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and healthy controls and propose a refined CMR definition for SBHF.
Methods:
Sex- and ethnic-specific thresholds for imaging criteria were derived from 373 healthy controls, who underwent CMR cine imaging. The current definition for SBHF and refined criteria was applied to our prospectively recruited and intensively phenotyped cohort of asymptomatic people with T2D and no evidence of cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of SBHF by different definitions was calculated and patient characteristics, including exercise capacity, were compared between those classified as Stage A vs. B HF. Finally, the refined criteria were also applied to the following two historical cohorts with symptomatic cardiovascular disease: severe aortic stenosis (AS n = 70) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF n = 136).
Results:
A total of 423 people with T2D and a subset of 102 healthy controls who underwent echocardiography were prospectively recruited. Current guideline criteria classified 91% of those with T2D and 69% of the healthy controls as SBHF, suggesting a lack of specificity. Applying derived sex- and ethnicity-specific thresholds, combining echo and CMR measures, the prevalence of SBHF was reduced to 30% in those with T2D. Using the refined definition, those with Stage B HF had lower exercise capacity than those with Stage A HF (percentage predicted maximal oxygen consumption 81 ± 16% vs. 91 ± 20%, p < 0.001). Applying the refined definition to symptomatic AS and HFpEF participants classified 89% and 85% with abnormal cardiac remodelling.
Conclusion:
Current guideline criteria for SBHF are non-specific and likely of limited value in clinical practice. Refining these criteria with sex- and ethnic-specific thresholds may improve identification of those at risk of developing symptomatic disease. Further research is required to validate these criteria.
More Related Videos
03:47Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies