Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.8K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.0K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.0K
Detection of Black Holes01:10

Detection of Black Holes

2.5K
Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
2.5K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.3K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.3K
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods01:18

Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods

660
Different methods, such as visual observance of metal-ion indicators, spectroscopic techniques, and potentiometric methods, can determine the endpoint of an EDTA titration.
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
660
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

11.3K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fractal, recurrent, and dense U-Net architectures with EfficientNet encoder for medical image segmentation.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2023
Same author

Through-Ice Acoustic Source Tracking Using Vision Transformers with Ordinal Classification.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Recurrent networks for direction-of-arrival identification of an acoustic source in a shallow water channel using a vector sensor.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021
Same author

Urban Tree Species Classification Using a WorldView-2/3 and LiDAR Data Fusion Approach and Deep Learning.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2019
Same author

Target Localization and Tracking by Fusing Doppler Differentials from Cellular Emanations with a Multi-Spectral Video Tracker.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2018
Same author

Handwritten Bangla Character Recognition Using the State-of-the-Art Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Computational intelligence and neuroscience·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.0K

Revisiting Underwater Image Enhancement for Object Detection: A Unified Quality-Detection Evaluation Framework.

Ali Awad1, Ashraf Saleem1, Sidike Paheding2

  • 1Department of Applied Computing, College of Computing, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA.

Journal of Imaging
|January 27, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Underwater image enhancement can improve object detection, but only for low-quality images. Selective enhancement offers significant gains over no or full enhancement, guiding future computer vision task optimization.

Keywords:
enhancement–detection interactionimage enhancementimage quality assessmentmAP analysisobject detectionper-image evaluationunderwater imaging

More Related Videos

A Unified Methodological Framework for Vestibular Schwannoma Research
08:43

A Unified Methodological Framework for Vestibular Schwannoma Research

Published on: June 20, 2017

7.8K
Gold Nanoparticle Modified Carbon Fiber Microelectrodes for Enhanced Neurochemical Detection
07:34

Gold Nanoparticle Modified Carbon Fiber Microelectrodes for Enhanced Neurochemical Detection

Published on: May 13, 2019

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.0K
A Unified Methodological Framework for Vestibular Schwannoma Research
08:43

A Unified Methodological Framework for Vestibular Schwannoma Research

Published on: June 20, 2017

7.8K
Gold Nanoparticle Modified Carbon Fiber Microelectrodes for Enhanced Neurochemical Detection
07:34

Gold Nanoparticle Modified Carbon Fiber Microelectrodes for Enhanced Neurochemical Detection

Published on: May 13, 2019

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Vision
  • Image Processing
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Underwater images suffer from poor quality (color distortion, low contrast, reduced visibility).
  • Image enhancement is commonly used, but its benefit for object detection is debated.
  • Existing evaluations lack rigor and granularity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively evaluate state-of-the-art underwater image enhancement methods for object detection.
  • To propose a unified framework for rigorous, fine-grained performance assessment.
  • To investigate the impact of enhancement on detection accuracy at both dataset and image levels.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a unified evaluation framework integrating quality assessment (Q-index) and per-image detection (COCO mAP).
  • Evaluated nine enhancement methods against modern object detectors.
  • Conducted mixed-set analysis to determine theoretical performance limits of selective enhancement.

Main Results:

  • Traditional quality metrics do not reliably predict object detection performance.
  • Dataset-level analysis obscures significant image-level variability.
  • Enhancement improves detection accuracy for low-quality inputs but can degrade performance in other cases.
  • Selective enhancement yields substantial gains over original and fully enhanced datasets.

Conclusions:

  • Underwater image enhancement can benefit object detection when evaluated granularly.
  • Selective enhancement strategies are crucial for optimizing performance in computer vision tasks.
  • This study provides evidence for the judicious application of enhancement techniques.