Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

A Paired Bead and Magnet Array for Molding Microwells with Variable Concave Geometries
Published on: January 28, 2018
Geometry-Dependent Photonic Nanojet Formation and Arrays Coupling
Zehua Sun1, Shaobo Ge1, Lujun Shen1
1Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Thin Films Technology and Optical Test, School of Optoelectronic Engineering, Institute for Interdisciplinary and Innovation Research, Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an 710021, China.
Abstract:
This work systematically investigates photonic nanojet (PNJ) planar arrays formed by periodic arrangements of dielectric microstructures with four geometric configurations: cylinders, cones, truncated pyramids, and pyramids, focusing on the effects of geometry, array arrangement, and array sparsity on PNJ formation and coupling behavior. Full-wave finite-difference time-domain simulations were performed to analyze optical field distributions under different array conditions. The results indicate that under approximately infinite array conditions, different geometries exhibit markedly different coupling responses. Cylindrical and truncated pyramid structures are more susceptible to inter-element scattering, leading to pronounced multistage focusing, whereas pyramid and cone structures maintain higher spatial stability due to dominant localized tip-focusing mechanisms. For the central elements, the maximum PNJ intensity is about 16.4 a.u. for cylindrical structures and 33.5 a.u. for truncated pyramid structures, while significantly higher intensities of approximately 47.5 a.u. and 93 a.u. are achieved for pyramid and cone structures, respectively. In contrast, the FWHM remains nearly constant for all geometries under different array conditions, indicating that lateral focusing is primarily governed by geometry rather than array arrangement. By tuning the array spacing, the inter-element coupling strength can be continuously weakened, and different geometries require distinct sparsity levels to reach the weak-coupling limit. These results establish the dominant role of geometric configuration in PNJ planar arrays and provide guidance for their predictable design.
Related Concept Videos
Coordination Number and Geometry
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Molecular Geometry and Dipole Moments
Radicals: Electronic Structure and Geometry
Accordingly, the structure of a trivalent radical lies between the geometries of carbocations and carbanions. An sp2-hybridized carbocation is trigonal planar, while an sp3-hybridized carbanion is trigonal pyramidal. Here, the difference in geometry is...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...

