Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Quasi-metagenomic Analysis of Salmonella from Food and Environmental Samples
Published on: October 25, 2018
A 2-Group Path Analysis of a Food Environment Conceptual Model by Food Security Status: Home Food Environment
Cerra C Antonacci1, Regine Haardörfer2, Megan R Winkler2
1Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Background:
The Model of Community Nutrition Environments is a well-known conceptual model in public health nutrition, although few studies have tested the model as a valid representation of food environment-diet pathways. Further, no study has explored whether the model differs by food security status, despite documented disparities in food environments and diet for those experiencing food insecurity.
Objective:
To test the Model of Community Nutrition Environments by food security status using multigroup path analysis.
Design:
This secondary analysis of baseline data from a hybrid-effectiveness implementation trial, Healthy Homes/Healthy Families, which included a home environment survey and 2 unscheduled 24-hour dietary recalls, was merged with the US Department of Agriculture 2019 Food Access Research Atlas.
Participants/Setting:
Participants recruited through 4 United Way 2-1-1 agencies in Georgia were eligible if they were aged 18 to 70 years, spoke English, and self-reported a body mass index ≥20. Baseline data collection occurred from October 2020 to December 2022 (N = 510 participants).
Main Outcome Measures:
Main outcomes included Healthy Eating Index 2015 component scores for total fruits and total vegetables.
Analyses:
Multigroup path analysis compared the unstandardized effects of pathways in the Model of Community Nutrition Environments for those who were food secure and food insecure.
Results:
The 2-group model had good global model fit (root mean square error of approximation = 0.000, comparative fit index = 1.000, Tucker-Lewis index = 1.000, standardized root mean square residual = 0.047). Home availability (b = .08 ± .04; P = .029) and accessibility (b = .68 ± .27; P = .012) of fruits and vegetables were positively associated with Healthy Eating Index 2015 scores for total vegetables among those with food security. No significant associations were found with either outcome among those with food insecurity. The food secure model explained more variance in the outcomes than the food insecure model (food secure: R2totalfruits = 0.20, R2total vegetables = 0.36; food insecure: R2total fruits = 0.10, R2totalvegetables = 0.06).
Conclusions:
Additional mechanisms need to be added to the Model of Community Nutrition Environments to better explain food environment-diet pathways for those experiencing food insecurity.
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Food Intake
Microorganisms in Agriculture and Food industry
Pharmacokinetics: Drug–Food and Drug–Viral Interactions
Gene-Environment Interactions
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

