Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness01:14

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness

2.6K
Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
2.6K
Drug Distribution: Volume of Distribution01:25

Drug Distribution: Volume of Distribution

7.4K
The volume of distribution refers to the theoretical volume necessary to contain the entire amount of an administered drug at the same concentration observed in the blood plasma. The body's intracellular fluid compartment, which makes up two-thirds of the total body water, is contrasted with the extracellular fluid compartment—comprising plasma and interstitial fluid—that accounts for one-third. The volume of distribution can vary depending on the characteristics of the drug.
7.4K
F Distribution01:19

F Distribution

10.7K
The F distribution was named after Sir Ronald Fisher, an English statistician. The F statistic is a ratio (a fraction) with two sets of degrees of freedom; one for the numerator and one for the denominator. The F distribution is derived from the Student's t distribution. The values of the F distribution are squares of the corresponding values of the t distribution. One-Way ANOVA expands the t test for comparing more than two groups. The scope of that derivation is beyond the level of this...
10.7K
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

1.3K
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
1.3K
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

470
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
470
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

893
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
893

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Mittelbach et al. Sensing-Assisted Secure Communications over Correlated Rayleigh Fading Channels. <i>Entropy</i> 2025, <i>27</i>, 225.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Harnessing the Power of Pre-Trained Models for Efficient Semantic Communication of Text and Images.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Sensing-Assisted Secure Communications over Correlated Rayleigh Fading Channels.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same journal

Research on a Regional Availability Evaluation Model for Road-Area High-Entropy Energy Based on Synergy Factors.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Atmospheric Turbulence Channel Modeling and Performance Analysis of a CO-ZP-OFDM Coherent Optical Communication System for UAV Air-to-Ground Scenarios.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Information Geometry and Asymptotic Theory for SMML Estimators.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Correlation Entropy and Power-Law Kinetics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Research on the Contagion of Systemic Financial Risk Under the Impact of Climate Risks-From the Perspective of Complex Networks and Machine Learning.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Statistical-Mechanical Meaning of the Wave Function of Quantum Mechanics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Synthesis of Phase-shift Nanoemulsions with Narrow Size Distributions for Acoustic Droplet Vaporization and Bubble-enhanced Ultrasound-mediated Ablation
08:28

Synthesis of Phase-shift Nanoemulsions with Narrow Size Distributions for Acoustic Droplet Vaporization and Bubble-enhanced Ultrasound-mediated Ablation

Published on: September 13, 2012

11.6K

Federated Learning Under Evolving Distribution Shifts.

Xuwei Tan1, Tian Xie1, Xue Zheng2

  • 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 28, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Federated learning (FL) models can now adapt to changing client data distributions over time. New algorithms, FedEvolve and FedEvp, ensure models generalize to future data despite evolving patterns.

Keywords:
ML robustnessdistributed learningdistribution shiftsfederated learning

More Related Videos

Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER
07:26

Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER

Published on: May 19, 2019

12.8K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Synthesis of Phase-shift Nanoemulsions with Narrow Size Distributions for Acoustic Droplet Vaporization and Bubble-enhanced Ultrasound-mediated Ablation
08:28

Synthesis of Phase-shift Nanoemulsions with Narrow Size Distributions for Acoustic Droplet Vaporization and Bubble-enhanced Ultrasound-mediated Ablation

Published on: September 13, 2012

11.6K
Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER
07:26

Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER

Published on: May 19, 2019

12.8K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Distributed Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training without centralizing raw data.
  • Existing FL methods often assume static client data distributions, which is unrealistic.
  • Real-world FL scenarios involve dynamic, non-trivial changes in client data over time, even between training and testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop FL algorithms capable of training models on time-evolving client data.
  • To enhance FL system robustness against evolving data distribution shifts.
  • To achieve generalization to future target data in dynamic FL environments.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed FedEvolve algorithm: Explicitly models temporal evolution by learning representation transitions between consecutive client data domains.
  • Proposed FedEvp algorithm: Learns an evolving-domain-invariant representation by aligning current data with continuously updated prototypes from all past domains.
  • Extensive experiments conducted on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Main Results:

  • FedEvolve and FedEvp demonstrated significant performance improvements over traditional FL baselines.
  • The proposed algorithms effectively captured evolving patterns in client data distributions.
  • The methods showed robustness and strong generalization capabilities under evolving distribution shifts.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed FedEvolve and FedEvp algorithms successfully address the challenge of dynamic client data distributions in federated learning.
  • These novel approaches enable FL systems to generalize effectively to future data despite temporal shifts.
  • The findings highlight the importance of accounting for data evolution in realistic FL applications.